Literature DB >> 23529701

Work-related psychosocial and mechanical risk factors for work disability: a 3-year follow-up study of the general working population in Norway.

Tom Sterud1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examines the impact of work-related psychosocial and mechanical risk factors for work disability in the general working population.
METHODS: A randomly drawn cohort from the general population in Norway aged 18-66 years was followed for 3 years (N = 12 550, 67% response rate at baseline). Eligible respondents were in paid work for ≥ 10 hours per week in 2006 and were still in paid work or had quit working because of health problems (work disability) in 2009 (N = 6745). Five work-related psychosocial factors and eight mechanical exposures were measured. The outcome of interest was self-reported work disability at 3-year follow-up.
RESULTS: In total, 2.6% (176 individuals) reported work disability at the 3-year follow-up. Disability rates were higher among women, older workers, and those with fewer years of education and higher levels of psychological distress and musculoskeletal complaints. After adjusting for these factors, work-related psychosocial predictors of disability were low levels of supportive leadership [odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.02-2.56] and monotonous work (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.09-2.16). Mechanical factors were neck flexion (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.36-4.56), prolonged standing (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.21-2.46), whole-body vibration (OR 4.15, 95% CI 1.77-9.71), and heavy physical work (OR 2.23. 95% CI 1.08-4.57). The estimated population risk attributable to these factors was about 45%.
CONCLUSION: Monotonous work, prolonged standing, neck flexion, and whole-body vibration appear to be the most consistent and important predictors of work disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23529701     DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health        ISSN: 0355-3140            Impact factor:   5.024


  11 in total

Review 1.  Psychological and psychosocial determinants of musculoskeletal pain and associated disability.

Authors:  Sergio Vargas-Prada; David Coggon
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.098

2.  Psychological, social, and mechanical work exposures and disability retirement: a prospective registry study.

Authors:  Jan S Emberland; Morten Birkeland Nielsen; Stein Knardahl
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 3.  The contribution from psychological, social, and organizational work factors to risk of disability retirement: a systematic review with meta-analyses.

Authors:  Stein Knardahl; Håkon A Johannessen; Tom Sterud; Mikko Härmä; Reiner Rugulies; Jorma Seitsamo; Vilhelm Borg
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Workplace Bullying as a Predictor of Disability Retirement: A Prospective Registry Study of Norwegian Employees.

Authors:  Morten Birkeland Nielsen; Jan Shahid Emberland; Stein Knardahl
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.162

5.  Physical working conditions as covered in European monitoring questionnaires.

Authors:  Tore Tynes; Cecilie Aagestad; Sannie Vester Thorsen; Lars Louis Andersen; Merja Perkio-Makela; Francisco Javier Pinilla García; Luz Galiana Blanco; Greet Vermeylen; Agnes Parent-Thirion; Wendela Hooftman; Irene Houtman; Falk Liebers; Hermann Burr; Maren Formazin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  How does accelerometry-measured arm elevation at work influence prospective risk of long-term sickness absence?

Authors:  Nidhi Gupta; Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Mikael Forsman; Karen Søgaard; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 5.492

Review 7.  How Will the Future of Work Shape OSH Research and Practice? A Workshop Summary.

Authors:  Sarah A Felknor; Jessica M K Streit; Michelle McDaniel; Paul A Schulte; L Casey Chosewood; George L Delclos
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  A Lower Level of Physically Demanding Work Is Associated with Excellent Work Ability in Men and Women with Neck Pain in Different Age Groups.

Authors:  Stefan Oliv; Adnan Noor; Ewa Gustafsson; Mats Hagberg
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2017-04-06

9.  Who reported having a high-strain job, low-strain job, active job and passive job? The WIRUS Screening study.

Authors:  Tore Bonsaksen; Mikkel Magnus Thørrisen; Jens Christoffer Skogen; Randi Wågø Aas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Are Work Demand, Support and Control Associated with Work Ability and Disability during Back Pain Treatment? A Prospective Explorative Study.

Authors:  Monica Unsgaard-Tøndel; Anne Lovise Nordstoga
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.