Literature DB >> 23529547

Normalizing gene expression by quantitative PCR during somatic embryogenesis in two representative conifer species: Pinus pinaster and Picea abies.

José J de Vega-Bartol1, Raquen Raissa Santos, Marta Simões, Célia M Miguel.   

Abstract

KEY MESSAGE: Suitable internal control genes to normalize qPCR data from different stages of embryo development and germination were identified in two representative conifer species. Clonal propagation by somatic embryogenesis has a great application potentiality in conifers. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is widely used for gene expression analysis during somatic embryogenesis and embryo germination. No single reference gene is universal, so a systematic characterization of endogenous genes for concrete conditions is fundamental for accuracy. We identified suitable internal control genes to normalize qPCR data obtained at different steps of somatic embryogenesis (embryonal mass proliferation, embryo maturation and germination) in two representative conifer species, Pinus pinaster and Picea abies. Candidate genes included endogenous genes commonly used in conifers, genes previously tested in model plants, and genes with a lower variation of the expression along embryo development according to genome-wide transcript profiling studies. Three different algorithms were used to evaluate expression stability. The geometric average of the expression values of elongation factor-1α, α-tubulin and histone 3 in P. pinaster, and elongation factor-1α, α-tubulin, adenosine kinase and CAC in P. abies were adequate for expression studies throughout somatic embryogenesis. However, improved accuracy was achieved when using other gene combinations in experiments with samples at a single developmental stage. The importance of studies selecting reference genes to use in different tissues or developmental stages within one or close species, and the instability of commonly used reference genes, is highlighted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23529547     DOI: 10.1007/s00299-013-1407-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Rep        ISSN: 0721-7714            Impact factor:   4.570


  50 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data.

Authors:  Christian Ramakers; Jan M Ruijter; Ronald H Lekanne Deprez; Antoon F M Moorman
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Embryogenesis in Higher Plants: An Overview.

Authors:  MAL. West; J. J. Harada
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Error propagation in relative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction quantification models: the balance between accuracy and precision.

Authors:  Oddmund Nordgård; Jan Terje Kvaløy; Ragne Kristin Farmen; Reino Heikkilä
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Gene expression patterns during somatic embryo development and germination in maize Hi II callus cultures.

Authors:  Ping Che; Tanzy M Love; Bronwyn R Frame; Kan Wang; Alicia L Carriquiry; Stephen H Howell
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 4.076

6.  Selection of reference genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR analysis in citrus.

Authors:  Jiawen Yan; Feirong Yuan; Guiyou Long; Lei Qin; Ziniu Deng
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  Identification and evaluation of new reference genes in Gossypium hirsutum for accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data.

Authors:  Sinara Artico; Sarah M Nardeli; Osmundo Brilhante; Maria Fátima Grossi-de-Sa; Marcio Alves-Ferreira
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  PpRab1, a Rab GTPase from maritime pine is differentially expressed during embryogenesis.

Authors:  Sónia Gonçalves; John Cairney; María Pérez Rodríguez; Francisco Cánovas; Margarida Oliveira; Célia Miguel
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  Identification of genes differentially expressed during adventitious shoot induction in Pinus pinea cotyledons by subtractive hybridization and quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Pablo Alonso; Millán Cortizo; Francisco R Cantón; Belén Fernández; Ana Rodríguez; Maria L Centeno; Francisco M Cánovas; Ricardo J Ordás
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.196

10.  Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes.

Authors:  Jo Vandesompele; Katleen De Preter; Filip Pattyn; Bruce Poppe; Nadine Van Roy; Anne De Paepe; Frank Speleman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-06-18       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  16 in total

1.  Defining reference genes for qPCR normalization to study biotic and abiotic stress responses in Vigna mungo.

Authors:  Anirban Kundu; Anju Patel; Amita Pal
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  Identification of a novel reference gene for apple transcriptional profiling under postharvest conditions.

Authors:  Tatiane Timm Storch; Camila Pegoraro; Taciane Finatto; Vera Quecini; Cesar Valmor Rombaldi; César Luis Girardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Identification and Evaluation of Reference Genes for Quantitative Analysis of Brazilian Pine (Araucaria angustifolia Bertol. Kuntze) Gene Expression.

Authors:  Paula Elbl; Bruno V Navarro; Leandro F de Oliveira; Juliana Almeida; Amanda C Mosini; André L W Dos Santos; Magdalena Rossi; Eny I S Floh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in oil palm elite planting materials propagated by tissue culture.

Authors:  Pek-Lan Chan; Ray J Rose; Abdul Munir Abdul Murad; Zamri Zainal; Eng-Ti Leslie Low; Leslie Cheng-Li Ooi; Siew-Eng Ooi; Suzaini Yahya; Rajinder Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Insights Into the Mechanisms Implicated in Pinus pinaster Resistance to Pinewood Nematode.

Authors:  Inês Modesto; Lieven Sterck; Vicent Arbona; Aurelio Gómez-Cadenas; Isabel Carrasquinho; Yves Van de Peer; Célia M Miguel
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Transcriptomic analysis highlights epigenetic and transcriptional regulation during zygotic embryo development of Pinus pinaster.

Authors:  José J de Vega-Bartol; Marta Simões; W Walter Lorenz; Andreia S Rodrigues; Rob Alba; Jeffrey F D Dean; Célia M Miguel
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Selection of reference genes for gene expression studies in Siberian Apricot (Prunus sibirica L.) Germplasm using quantitative real-time PCR.

Authors:  Jun Niu; Baoqing Zhu; Jian Cai; Peixue Li; Libing Wang; Huitang Dai; Lin Qiu; Haiyan Yu; Denglong Ha; Haiyan Zhao; Zhixiang Zhang; Shanzhi Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Selection and Validation of Reference Genes for qRT-PCR in Cycas elongata.

Authors:  Yanting Hu; Tian Deng; Letian Chen; Hong Wu; Shouzhou Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reference Genes for qPCR Analysis in Resin-Tapped Adult Slash Pine As a Tool to Address the Molecular Basis of Commercial Resinosis.

Authors:  Júlio C de Lima; Fernanda de Costa; Thanise N Füller; Kelly C da Silva Rodrigues-Corrêa; Magnus R Kerber; Mariano S Lima; Janette P Fett; Arthur G Fett-Neto
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Selection of Reference Genes for Real-Time Quantitative PCR in Pinus massoniana Post Nematode Inoculation.

Authors:  Yongcheng Wei; Qinghua Liu; Hongyu Dong; Zhichun Zhou; Yanping Hao; Xuelian Chen; Liuyi Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.