Literature DB >> 23529272

Diagnostic performance of initial transperineal 14-core prostate biopsy to detect significant cancer.

Hideki Takeshita1, Noboru Numao, Toshiki Kijima, Minato Yokoyama, Junichiro Ishioka, Yoh Matsuoka, Fumitaka Koga, Kazutaka Saito, Hitoshi Masuda, Satoru Kawakami, Shinya Yamamoto, Junji Yonese, Yasuhisa Fujii, Kazunori Kihara.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate cancers missed by extended transperineal (TP) 14-core biopsy (TP14PBx) and examined its diagnostic performance.
METHODS: We evaluated 744 men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in the range 2.5-20 ng/mL or abnormal digital rectal examination underwent three-dimensional 26-core prostate biopsy (3D26PBx), a combination of TP14PBx and transrectal 12-core biopsy (TR12PBx), at initial biopsy. Of 269 patients diagnosed with cancer, 127 subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). Cancers were grouped into TP-positive cancers (detected through TP14PBx) and TP-negative cancers (those not detected through TP14PBx but detected through TR12PBx). Clinicopathological characteristics and cancer locations of TP-negative cancers were evaluated. For cancer location analysis, the prostate was divided into apex, midprostate, and base regions.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven (14 %) TP-negative cancers were found in 269 biopsy-positive cancers. Median number of positive cores in TP-negative cancers was significantly lower than that in TP-positive cancers (1 vs. 5, p < 0.001). TP-negative cancers had biopsy Gleason score (GS) of 7 or less in 87 % of cases and had significantly lower biopsy GS than those of TP-positive cancers (p = 0.028). Of 20 TP-negative cancers treated with RP, 70 % (14/20) were insignificant cancers (GS <4+3, volume <0.5 cc, and organ-confined disease). Of all significant cancers treated with RP, 6 % (6/99) were missed by TP14PBx. TP-negative cancers treated with RP were located more frequently in the apex than in the base (85 vs. 20 %, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Initial TP14PBx provides sufficient detectability of significant cancers despite a small risk of missing cancers located in the prostate apex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23529272     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-013-0416-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  22 in total

1.  Characteristics and clinical significance of prostate cancers missed by initial transrectal 12-core biopsy.

Authors:  Noboru Numao; Satoru Kawakami; Mizuaki Sakura; Soichiro Yoshida; Fumitaka Koga; Kazutaka Saito; Hitoshi Masuda; Yasuhisa Fujii; Shinya Yamamoto; Junji Yonese; Yuichi Ishikawa; Iwao Fukui; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; William C Allsbrook; Mahul B Amin; Lars L Egevad
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Three-dimensional combination of transrectal and transperineal biopsies for efficient detection of stage T1c prostate cancer.

Authors:  Satoru Kawakami; Nobuhiko Hyochi; Junji Yonese; Masataka Yano; Yasuhisa Fujii; Yukio Kageyama; Iwao Fukui; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Improved accuracy in predicting the presence of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer by three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy.

Authors:  Noboru Numao; Satoru Kawakami; Minato Yokoyama; Junji Yonese; Chizuru Arisawa; Yuichi Ishikawa; Masao Ando; Iwao Fukui; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Transperineal ultrasound-guided 12-core systematic biopsy of the prostate for patients with a prostate-specific antigen level of 2.5-20 ng/ml in Japan.

Authors:  Shinya Yamamoto; Ujin Kin; Kazuyoshi Nakamura; Masaaki Hamano; Yasuyo Nishikawa; Toshinao Takenouchi; Masayuki Maruoka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  How good is MRI at detecting and characterising cancer within the prostate?

Authors:  Alexander P S Kirkham; Mark Emberton; Clare Allen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive vs open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Michael J Barry; Anthony V D'Amico; Aaron C Weinberg; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Direct comparison between transrectal and transperineal extended prostate biopsy for the detection of cancer.

Authors:  Satoru Kawakami; Shinya Yamamoto; Noboru Numao; Yuichi Ishikawa; Kazunori Kihara; Iwao Fukui
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.369

9.  Simple and effective local anesthesia for transperineal extended prostate biopsy: application to three-dimensional 26-core biopsy.

Authors:  Yuichi Kubo; Satoru Kawakami; Noboru Numao; Ryoji Takazawa; Yasuhisa Fujii; Hitoshi Masuda; Toshihiko Tsujii; Kazunori Kihara
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 10.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy: supportive data for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Oren Cahlon; Margie Hunt; Michael J Zelefsky
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.934

View more
  1 in total

1.  Identifying the Presence of Prostate Cancer in Individuals with PSA Levels <20 ng ml-1 Using Computational Data Extraction Analysis of High Dimensional Peripheral Blood Flow Cytometric Phenotyping Data.

Authors:  Georgina Cosma; Stéphanie E McArdle; Stephen Reeder; Gemma A Foulds; Simon Hood; Masood Khan; A Graham Pockley
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 7.561

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.