Literature DB >> 23528669

The relative cost of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early oral cancer.

Rory O'Connor1, Tom Pezier, Clare Schilling, Mark McGurk.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The European Sentinel Node (SENT) trial addressed the question of the clinically lymph node negative (cN0) neck in early oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Apart from reducing neck dissection numbers, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) may reduce treatment cost. Using a treatment model derived from SENT trial information, estimates were produced of relative treatment costs between patients managed through a traditional surgical or SLNB pathway.
METHODS: The model created two management approaches, the traditional surgical pathway and SLNB pathway. Using SENT trial data regarding the proportion of patients with positive, negative and false negative SLNB's a relative cost ratio (RCR) for 100 hypothetical patients passing down each pathway was generated.
RESULTS: From a cohort of 481 patients, 25% had a positive SLNB, 75% a negative result and 2.5% a false negative result. Treatment of 100 hypothetical patients using the SLNB pathway is 0.35-0.60 the cost of treating the same cohort using traditional surgery techniques. Even if 100% of SLNB's are positive the SLNB approach is 0.91 of the cost of the traditional surgical approach.
CONCLUSION: The SLNB approach appears to be cheaper relative to the traditional surgical approach, especially when extrapolated to 100 hypothetical patients.
Copyright © 2013 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost analysis; Lymphatic metastasis; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; Sentinel lymph node biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23528669     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: current status and unresolved challenges.

Authors:  Christina Bluemel; Domenico Rubello; Patrick M Colletti; Remco de Bree; Ken Herrmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy for oral cancer: supporting evidence and recent novel developments.

Authors:  Marcus M Monroe; Stephen Y Lai
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Comprehensive cost analysis of sentinel node biopsy in solid head and neck tumors using a time-driven activity-based costing approach.

Authors:  Ralph Crott; Georges Lawson; Marie-Cécile Nollevaux; Annick Castiaux; Bruno Krug
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  What is the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of oral cancer in 2020?

Authors:  Remco de Bree; Bart de Keizer; Francisco J Civantos; Robert P Takes; Juan P Rodrigo; Juan C Hernandez-Prera; Gyorgy B Halmos; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Annexin A8 is a novel molecular marker for detecting lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ryota Oka; Koh-Ichi Nakashiro; Hiroyuki Goda; Kazuki Iwamoto; Norihiko Tokuzen; Hiroyuki Hamakawa
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.