Literature DB >> 23528566

Dual time point 18FDG-PET/CT versus single time point 18FDG-PET/CT for the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules: a meta-analysis.

Li Zhang1, Yinzhong Wang, Junqiang Lei, Jinhui Tian, Yanan Zhai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is one of the most common cancer types in the world. An accurate diagnosis of lung cancer is crucial for early treatment and management.
PURPOSE: To perform a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of dual time point 18F-fluorodexyglucose position emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and single time point 18FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed (1966-2011.11), EMBASE (1974-2011.11), Web of Science (1972-2011.11), Cochrane Library (-2011.11), and four Chinese databases - CBM (1978-2011.11), CNKI (1994-2011.11), VIP (1989-2011.11), and Wanfang Database (1994-2011.11) - were searched. Summary sensitivity, summary specificity, summary diagnostic odds ratios (DOR), and summary positive likelihood ratios (LR+) and negative likelihood ratios (LR-) were obtained using Meta-Disc software. Summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of dual time point 18FDG-PET/CT and single time point 18FDG-PET/CT.
RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by eight articles, with a total of 415 patients and 430 pulmonary nodules. Compared with the gold standard (pathology or clinical follow-up), the summary sensitivity of dual time point 18FDG-PET/CT was 79% (95%CI, 74.0-84.0%), and its summary specificity was 73% (95%CI, 65.0-79.0%); the summary LR+ was 2.61 (95%CI, 1.96-3.47), and the summary LR- was 0.29 (95%CI, 0.21-0.41); the summary DOR was 10.25 (95%CI, 5.79-18.14), and the area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.8244. The summary sensitivity for single time point 18FDG-PET/CT was 77% (95%CI, 71.9-82.3%), and its summary specificity was 59% (95%CI, 50.6-66.2%); the summary LR+ was 1.97 (95%CI, 1.32-2.93), and the summary LR- was 0.37 (95%CI, 0.29-0.49); the summary DOR was 6.39 (95%CI, 3.39-12.05), and the AUC was 0.8220.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that dual time point 18FDG-PET/CT and single time point 18FDG-PET/CT have similar accuracy in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Dual time point 18FDG-PET/CT appears to be more specific than single time point 18FDG-PET/CT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PET/CT; Pulmonary nodule; diagnosis; meta-analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23528566     DOI: 10.1177/0284185113481594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  7 in total

1.  Value of delayed 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodule.

Authors:  Ali Nawaz Khan; Hamdan Al-Jahdali
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

3.  The clinical value of texture analysis of dual-time-point 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging to differentiate between 18F-FDG-avid benign and malignant pulmonary lesions.

Authors:  Masatoyo Nakajo; Megumi Jinguji; Masaya Aoki; Atsushi Tani; Masami Sato; Takashi Yoshiura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Prognostic value of volumetric parameters of (18)F-FDG PET in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hyung-Jun Im; Kyoungjune Pak; Gi Jeong Cheon; Keon Wook Kang; Seong-Jang Kim; In-Joo Kim; June-Key Chung; E Edmund Kim; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Using neighborhood gray tone difference matrix texture features on dual time point PET/CT images to differentiate malignant from benign FDG-avid solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Song Chen; Stephanie Harmon; Timothy Perk; Xuena Li; Meijie Chen; Yaming Li; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 6.  Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT with Different Radiotracers in Patients with Suspicious Lung Cancer or Pleural Tumours according to Published Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Filippo Lococo; Barbara Muoio; Marco Chiappetta; Dania Nachira; Leonardo Petracca Ciavarella; Stefano Margaritora; Giorgio Treglia
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 7.  Solitary pulmonary nodule and (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Part 2: accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and current recommendations.

Authors:  Marcos Pretto Mosmann; Marcelle Alves Borba; Francisco Pires Negromonte de Macedo; Adriano de Araujo Lima Liguori; Arthur Villarim Neto; Kenio Costa de Lima
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.