Literature DB >> 23527900

A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.

Roberta Marino1, Nicola Linton, Robert H Eikelboom, Elle Statham, Gunesh P Rajan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the efficacy of the round window (RW) application of the vibrant soundbridge (VSB) in patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss.
DESIGN: Speech in quiet and in noise were compared to preoperative data attained with conventional hearing aids so that each subject served as his or her own control in a single test protocol. STUDY SAMPLE: Eighteen adults implanted monaurally with the VSB in the poorer hearing ear. Experience with the VSB ranged from nine to 25 months.
RESULTS: Sixteen of the 18 subjects were successful VSB users, wearing their device all waking hours. There was no significant deterioration in the averaged bone conduction results preoperatively versus post-operatively (p>0.05). Speech recognition in quiet results were not significantly different to performance attained whilst wearing hearing aids (p>0.05). Speech recognition in noise performance was substantially improved with use of the VSB in most test conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: For the majority of the subjects, the VSB was an effective method of hearing restoration for their mixed and conductive hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23527900     DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2012.750431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Coupling of active middle ear implants-biomechanical aspects].

Authors:  M Bornitz; N Lasurashvili; M Neudert; T Beleites; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [Active hearing implants in chronic otitis media].

Authors:  S Lailach; C Müller; N Lasurashvili; H Seidler; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  [Differential indication of active middle ear implants].

Authors:  K Braun; H-P Zenner; N Friese; A Tropitzsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  Efficacy of Auditory Implants for Patients With Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss Depends on Implant Center.

Authors:  Ad Snik; Hannes Maier; Bill Hodgetts; Martin Kompis; Griet Mertens; Paul van de Heyning; Thomas Lenarz; Arjan Bosman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  A New Trans-Tympanic Microphone Approach for Fully Implantable Hearing Devices.

Authors:  Seong Tak Woo; Dong Ho Shin; Hyung-Gyu Lim; Ki-Woong Seong; Peter Gottlieb; Sunil Puria; Kyu-Yup Lee; Jin-Ho Cho
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Round Window Application of an Active Middle Ear Implant: A Comparison With Hearing Aid Usage in Japan.

Authors:  Satoshi Iwasaki; Shin-Ichi Usami; Haruo Takahashi; Yukihiko Kanda; Tetsuya Tono; Katsumi Doi; Kozo Kumakawa; Kiyofumi Gyo; Yasushi Naito; Sho Kanzaki; Noboru Yamanaka; Kimitaka Kaga
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.311

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.