OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of the fascial dilators modified with a scale marker in reducing fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHOD: In a randomized clinical trial, eligible 100 consecutive patients anticipated to undergo single-tract PCNL were randomly assigned into two groups by the closed envelope method, to compare the efficacy and safety of the modified scale fascial dilator (group 1, n=50) and traditional nonscale fascial dilator (group 2, n=50) with respect to the X-ray exposure duration as well as the outcome of PCNL. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 regarding to the initial successful access rate (100% v 96%), operative time (79.4 v 83.7 minutes), the initial stone-free rate (82% v 81.3%), complications (24% v 20%), and bleeding required blood transfusion (4% v 6%) (all p>0.05). The mean operative duration and fluoroscopic time for tract dilation in group 1 and group 2 were 164.4 ± 19 seconds v 168.3 ± 14 seconds, and 3.2 ± 0.9 seconds v 22.2 ± 4.6 seconds, (p=0.250 and p<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the use of nonscaled dilators, using the scaled fascial dilators for a percutaneous access in PCNL was found to be associated with less radiation hazards along with similar stone-free rate and complications.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of the fascial dilators modified with a scale marker in reducing fluoroscopy time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHOD: In a randomized clinical trial, eligible 100 consecutive patients anticipated to undergo single-tract PCNL were randomly assigned into two groups by the closed envelope method, to compare the efficacy and safety of the modified scale fascial dilator (group 1, n=50) and traditional nonscale fascial dilator (group 2, n=50) with respect to the X-ray exposure duration as well as the outcome of PCNL. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 regarding to the initial successful access rate (100% v 96%), operative time (79.4 v 83.7 minutes), the initial stone-free rate (82% v 81.3%), complications (24% v 20%), and bleeding required blood transfusion (4% v 6%) (all p>0.05). The mean operative duration and fluoroscopic time for tract dilation in group 1 and group 2 were 164.4 ± 19 seconds v 168.3 ± 14 seconds, and 3.2 ± 0.9 seconds v 22.2 ± 4.6 seconds, (p=0.250 and p<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the use of nonscaled dilators, using the scaled fascial dilators for a percutaneous access in PCNL was found to be associated with less radiation hazards along with similar stone-free rate and complications.
Authors: Gyanendra R Sharma; Pankaj N Maheshwari; Anshu G Sharma; Reeta P Maheshwari; Ritwik S Heda; Sakshi P Maheshwari Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2015-03-16 Impact factor: 1.337
Authors: Braulio O Manzo; Edgard Lozada; Gildardo Manzo; Héctor M Sánchez; Francisco Gomez; Alejandro Figueroa; Adrian Gonzalez Journal: Arab J Urol Date: 2019-04-24