Literature DB >> 23527781

On the universe of protein folds.

Rachel Kolodny1, Leonid Pereyaslavets, Abraham O Samson, Michael Levitt.   

Abstract

In the fifty years since the first atomic structure of a protein was revealed, tens of thousands of additional structures have been solved. Like all objects in biology, proteins structures show common patterns that seem to define family relationships. Classification of proteins structures, which started in the 1970s with about a dozen structures, has continued with increasing enthusiasm, leading to two main fold classifications, SCOP and CATH, as well as many additional databases. Classification is complicated by deciding what constitutes a domain, the fundamental unit of structure. Also difficult is deciding when two given structures are similar. Like all of biology, fold classification is beset by exceptions to all rules. Thus, the perspectives of protein fold space that the fold classifications offer differ from each other. In spite of these ambiguities, fold classifications are useful for prediction of structure and function. Studying the characteristics of fold space can shed light on protein evolution and the physical laws that govern protein behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23527781     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys        ISSN: 1936-122X            Impact factor:   12.981


  20 in total

1.  Nonlinearities in protein space limit the utility of informatics in protein biophysics.

Authors:  S Rackovsky
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2015-09-10

2.  Functional Evolution of Proteins.

Authors:  Jonathan Catazaro; Adam Caprez; David Swanson; Robert Powers
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-02-19

3.  Probabilistic divergence of a template-based modelling methodology from the ideal protocol.

Authors:  Ashish Runthala
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 4.  Watching Proteins Wiggle: Mapping Structures with Two-Dimensional Infrared Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ayanjeet Ghosh; Joshua S Ostrander; Martin T Zanni
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Global view of the protein universe.

Authors:  Sergey Nepomnyachiy; Nir Ben-Tal; Rachel Kolodny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Biophysics of protein evolution and evolutionary protein biophysics.

Authors:  Tobias Sikosek; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  High-accuracy protein structures by combining machine-learning with physics-based refinement.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Michael Feig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-11-15

8.  NMR in structural genomics to increase structural coverage of the protein universe: Delivered by Prof. Kurt Wüthrich on 7 July 2013 at the 38th FEBS Congress in St. Petersburg, Russia.

Authors:  Pedro Serrano; Samit K Dutta; Andrew Proudfoot; Biswaranjan Mohanty; Lukas Susac; Bryan Martin; Michael Geralt; Lukasz Jaroszewski; Adam Godzik; Marc Elsliger; Ian A Wilson; Kurt Wüthrich
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.542

Review 9.  Evolution of intrinsic disorder in eukaryotic proteins.

Authors:  Joseph B Ahrens; Janelle Nunez-Castilla; Jessica Siltberg-Liberles
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  De Novo Protein Design for Novel Folds Using Guided Conditional Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks.

Authors:  Mostafa Karimi; Shaowen Zhu; Yue Cao; Yang Shen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.