Literature DB >> 2352758

The effects of distraction on responses to cold pressor pain.

Robert L Hodes1, Eric W Rowland, Nancy Lightfoot, Charles S Cleeland.   

Abstract

Subjective pain ratings and tolerance time were obtained during 2 cold pressor immersions for 3 groups of subjects. During the second immersion 1 group performed no task and the other 2 groups performed either an easy or difficult mental arithmetic task. The sensory-discriminative response to pain was measured by pain ratings. Pain ratings were collected every minute until subjects removed their arm from the cold pressor or until 4 min passed. Relative to a baseline cold pressor immersion, subjects in both the distraction conditions reduced their 1 min pain ratings more than control subjects. This effect was weaker at the 2 min pain rating and absent at the later ratings. The affective-reactive response to pain was measured by pain tolerance times. Tolerance time was defined as the time when subjects removed their arm from the cold pressor. Tolerance time was not altered by the distraction tasks. These findings suggest that affectively neutral distraction alters the sensory but not the reactive response to pain. Clinical implications are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2352758     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(90)91115-Y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  10 in total

1.  Individual differences in the effects of music engagement on responses to painful stimulation.

Authors:  David H Bradshaw; Gary W Donaldson; Robert C Jacobson; Yoshio Nakamura; C Richard Chapman
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 2.  How does distraction work in the management of pain?

Authors:  Malcolm H Johnson
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2005-04

3.  Effects of music engagement on responses to painful stimulation.

Authors:  David H Bradshaw; C Richard Chapman; Robert C Jacobson; Gary W Donaldson
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Preoccupation in an early-romantic relationship predicts experimental pain relief.

Authors:  Aneesha Nilakantan; Jarred Younger; Arthur Aron; Sean Mackey
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Pain Distress Tolerance: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Timothy Y Mariano; Mascha van't Wout; Benjamin L Jacobson; Sarah L Garnaat; Jason L Kirschner; Steven A Rasmussen; Benjamin D Greenberg
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Clinical use of virtual reality distraction system to reduce anxiety and pain in dental procedures.

Authors:  Mark D Wiederhold; Kenneth Gao; Brenda K Wiederhold
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2014-06

7.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Targeting Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Modulates Task-Induced Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Timothy Y Mariano; Mascha Van't Wout; Sarah L Garnaat; Steven A Rasmussen; Benjamin D Greenberg
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.750

8.  The influence of sexual arousal on subjective pain intensity during a cold pressor test in women.

Authors:  Lara Lakhsassi; Charmaine Borg; Sophie Martusewicz; Karen van der Ploeg; Peter J de Jong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Emotional perception modulated by an opioid and a cholecystokinin agonist.

Authors:  Katarina Gospic; Tove Gunnarsson; Peter Fransson; Martin Ingvar; Nils Lindefors; Predrag Petrovic
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.415

10.  Viewing the body modulates both pain sensations and pain responses.

Authors:  Brianna Beck; Elisabetta Làdavas; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.