Literature DB >> 23527503

In search of the emotional face: anger versus happiness superiority in visual search.

Ruth A Savage1, Ottmar V Lipp, Belinda M Craig, Stefanie I Becker, Gernot Horstmann.   

Abstract

Previous research has provided inconsistent results regarding visual search for emotional faces, yielding evidence for either anger superiority (i.e., more efficient search for angry faces) or happiness superiority effects (i.e., more efficient search for happy faces), suggesting that these results do not reflect on emotional expression, but on emotion (un-)related low-level perceptual features. The present study investigated possible factors mediating anger/happiness superiority effects; specifically search strategy (fixed vs. variable target search; Experiment 1), stimulus choice (Nimstim database vs. Ekman & Friesen database; Experiments 1 and 2), and emotional intensity (Experiment 3 and 3a). Angry faces were found faster than happy faces regardless of search strategy using faces from the Nimstim database (Experiment 1). By contrast, a happiness superiority effect was evident in Experiment 2 when using faces from the Ekman and Friesen database. Experiment 3 employed angry, happy, and exuberant expressions (Nimstim database) and yielded anger and happiness superiority effects, respectively, highlighting the importance of the choice of stimulus materials. Ratings of the stimulus materials collected in Experiment 3a indicate that differences in perceived emotional intensity, pleasantness, or arousal do not account for differences in search efficiency. Across three studies, the current investigation indicates that prior reports of anger or happiness superiority effects in visual search are likely to reflect on low-level visual features associated with the stimulus materials used, rather than on emotion. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23527503     DOI: 10.1037/a0031970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  13 in total

1.  Measuring the emotion-specificity of rapid stimulus-driven attraction of attention to fearful faces: evidence from emotion categorization and a comparison with disgusted faces.

Authors:  Shah Khalid; Gernot Horstmann; Thomas Ditye; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-21

2.  Task-irrelevant fear enhances amygdala-FFG inhibition and decreases subsequent face processing.

Authors:  Barbara Schulte Holthausen; Ute Habel; Thilo Kellermann; Patrick D Schelenz; Frank Schneider; J Christopher Edgar; Bruce I Turetsky; Christina Regenbogen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Emotional SNARC: emotional faces affect the impact of number magnitude on gaze patterns.

Authors:  Ivan Blanco; Ines Nieto; Carmelo Vazquez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-06-22

Review 4.  Don't look now! Emotion-induced blindness: The interplay between emotion and attention.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Mark Edwards
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Introducing the Prototypical Stimulus Characteristics Toolbox: Protosc.

Authors:  S M Stuit; C L E Paffen; S Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  Pretty crowds are happy crowds: the influence of attractiveness on mood perception.

Authors:  Alica Mertens; Johanna Hepp; Andreas Voss; Amelie Hische
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-05-25

7.  Furious snarling: Teeth-exposure and anxiety-related attentional bias towards angry faces.

Authors:  Benedikt Emanuel Wirth; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Alexithymia Is Associated With Deficits in Visual Search for Emotional Faces in Clinical Depression.

Authors:  Thomas Suslow; Vivien Günther; Tilman Hensch; Anette Kersting; Charlott Maria Bodenschatz
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Attentional bias modification in depression through gaze contingencies and regulatory control using a new eye-tracking intervention paradigm: study protocol for a placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Carmelo Vazquez; Ivan Blanco; Alvaro Sanchez; Richard J McNally
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  It occurs after all: Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe task.

Authors:  Benedikt Emanuel Wirth; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.