Literature DB >> 23526807

Predictive value of apparent diffusion coefficient in evaluation of colorectal carcinoma hepatic metastases' response to radiofrequency ablation.

Edyta Szurowska1, Tomasz K Nowicki, Ewa Izycka-Swieszewska, Dariusz Zadrozny, Karolina Markiet, Michal Studniarek.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) suitability to evaluate the radiofrequency ablation (RFA) outcome in patients with chemotherapy resistant or partially responding colorectal adenocarcinoma liver metastases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 56 patients with 116 metastatic foci over 10 mm in diameter were examined with 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner 1 day before percutaneous RFA treatment. Lesions were evaluated in echo-planar diffusion-weighted images with b = 0, 15 and 500 s/mm(2) . On basis of computed tomography scan at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after RFA and serum CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) level lesion were recognized as responding or nonresponding lesions. ADC values for b = 0-15 and 0-500 s/mm(2) of responding and nonresponding lesions were compared.
RESULTS: Noncomplete ablation concerned 28 lesions. Mean pretreatment ADC values for b = 0-15 and 0-500 s/mm(2) of responding metastases were significantly lower (2.14 and 1.48 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s) than those of nonresponding tumors (2.7 and 1.74 × 10(-3) mm(2) /s). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ADC values for b = 0-15 s/mm(2) were 79 (95%CI = 59-92), 85 (95%CI = 76-92), 84%; and for b = 0-500 s/mm(2) , the efficacy parameters were, respectively, 78 (95%CI = 56-92), 78 (95%CI = 67-86), and 78%. The P value was under 0.001 for both b parameters.
CONCLUSION: The pretreatment ADCs values of chemotherapy resistant or partially responding colorectal adenocarcinoma liver metastatic lesion can be predictive factor of tumors response to RFA therapy.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRC; DWI; RFA; liver metastases

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23526807     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  4 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion MRI of cancer: From low to high b-values.

Authors:  Lei Tang; Xiaohong Joe Zhou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Liver metastases: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography and magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Vito Cantisani; Hektor Grazhdani; Cristina Fioravanti; Maria Rosignuolo; Fabrizio Calliada; Daniela Messineo; Maria Giulia Bernieri; Adriano Redler; Carlo Catalano; Ferdinando D'Ambrosio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Prognostication and response assessment in liver and pancreatic tumors: The new imaging.

Authors:  Riccardo De Robertis; Paolo Tinazzi Martini; Emanuele Demozzi; Gino Puntel; Silvia Ortolani; Sara Cingarlini; Andrea Ruzzenente; Alfredo Guglielmi; Giampaolo Tortora; Claudio Bassi; Paolo Pederzoli; Mirko D'Onofrio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging for focal liver lesions: bridging the gap between research and clinical practice.

Authors:  Roberto Cannella; Riccardo Sartoris; Jules Grégory; Lorenzo Garzelli; Valérie Vilgrain; Maxime Ronot; Marco Dioguardi Burgio
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.629

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.