Literature DB >> 23525934

Recombinant human activated protein C for adults with septic shock: a randomized controlled trial.

Djillali Annane1, Jean-François Timsit, Bruno Megarbane, Claude Martin, Benoit Misset, Bruno Mourvillier, Shidasp Siami, Jean-Luc Chagnon, Jean-Michel Constantin, Franck Petitpas, Bertrand Souweine, Roland Amathieu, Xavier Forceville, Claire Charpentier, Antoine Tesnière, Jean Chastre, Julien Bohe, Gwenhael Colin, Alain Cariou, Alain Renault, Christian Brun-Buisson, Eric Bellissant.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: A decade after drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DAA) was released on the market worldwide, its benefit-to-risk ratio remains a matter of debate.
OBJECTIVES: The current investigator-led trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DAA, in combination with low-dose steroids, in adults with persistent septic shock.
METHODS: This was a multicenter (24 intensive care units), placebo-controlled, double-blind, 2 × 2 factorial design trial in which adults with persistent septic shock and no contraindication to DAA were randomly assigned to DAA alone (24 μg/kg/h for 96 h), hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone alone, their respective combinations, or their respective placebos. Primary outcome was mortality rate on Day 90.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: On October 25, 2011, the trial was suspended after the withdrawal from the market of DAA. The Scientific Committee decided to continue the trial according to a two parallel group design comparing low-dose steroids with their placebos and to analyze the effects of DAA on patients included before trial suspension. At the time trial was suspended, 411 patients had been recruited, 208 had received DAA, and 203 had received its placebo. There was no significant interaction between DAA and low-dose steroids (P = 0.47). On Day 90, there were 99 deaths (47.6%) among the 208 patients receiving DAA and 94 deaths (46.3%) among the 203 patients receiving placebo (P = 0.79). There was no evidence of a difference between DAA and its placebo for any secondary outcomes or serious adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: In adults with established and severe septic shock, DAA showed no evidence of benefit or harm. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00625209).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23525934     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201211-2020OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  30 in total

Review 1.  Management of infections in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Tjasa Hranjec; Robert G Sawyer
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.150

2.  Health Insurance and Disparities in Mortality among Older Survivors of Critical Illness: A Population Study.

Authors:  Yoland F Philpotts; Xiaoyue Ma; Michaela R Anderson; May Hua; Matthew R Baldwin
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 3.  Coagulopathies and inflammatory diseases: '…glimpse of a Snark'.

Authors:  Silvina Del Carmen; Sophie M Hapak; Sourav Ghosh; Carla V Rothlin
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 7.486

Review 4.  Human recombinant protein C for severe sepsis and septic shock in adult and paediatric patients.

Authors:  Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Ivan Solà; Christian Gluud; Dimitrios Lathyris; Andrés Felipe Cardona
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

5.  The effect of sepsis and its inflammatory response on mechanical clot characteristics: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Gareth R Davies; Suresh Pillai; Matthew Lawrence; Gavin M Mills; Robert Aubrey; Lindsay D'Silva; Ceri Battle; Rhodri Williams; Rowan Brown; Dafydd Thomas; Keith Morris; Phillip Adrian Evans
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Targeting thrombomodulin to circulating red blood cells augments its protective effects in models of endotoxemia and ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Ronald Carnemolla; Carlos H Villa; Colin F Greineder; Sergei Zaitsev; Kruti R Patel; M Anna Kowalska; Dmitriy N Atochin; Douglas B Cines; Don L Siegel; Charles T Esmon; Vladimir R Muzykantov
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Carbon monoxide in the treatment of sepsis.

Authors:  Kiichi Nakahira; Augustine M K Choi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 8.  Control groups in recent septic shock trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ville Pettilä; Peter Buhl Hjortrup; Stephan M Jakob; Erika Wilkman; Anders Perner; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-07-23       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Antimicrobial Therapy in the Context of the Damage-Response Framework: the Prospect of Optimizing Therapy by Reducing Host Damage.

Authors:  Liise-Anne Pirofski; Arturo Casadevall
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Why activated protein C was not successful in severe sepsis and septic shock: are we still tilting at windmills?

Authors:  Peggy S Lai; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.