Literature DB >> 23525559

Predicting patient satisfaction using the Oxford knee score: where do we draw the line?

Nicholas D Clement1, Deborah Macdonald, Richard Burnett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to identify threshold values in the pre- and post-operative Oxford knee score (OKS), and change in the score for differing levels of patient satisfaction with their total knee replacement (TKR).
METHODS: We prospectively collected pre-operative and 1-year post-operative OKS for 2392 patients undergoing a TKR. Patient satisfaction was categorically assessed, according to whether they were: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, and unsatisfied. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify thresholds in the OKS score that identified each level of patient satisfaction.
RESULTS: The post-operative OKS was the most accurate predictor of the level of patient satisfaction (area under the curve = 0.86). Very satisfied patients had a threshold value in the post-operative OKS of ≥36, which decreased to ≥27 points for satisfied patients, and further still to ≤25 for unsatisfied patients.
CONCLUSION: The threshold values, we have identified for the different levels of satisfaction using the post-operative OKS, which is the most accurate predictor, can be used to predict level of patient satisfaction and give quantification of the OKS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23525559     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1728-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  12 in total

1.  When can I go home after my knee replacement? Factors affecting the duration of in-hospital stay after knee replacement.

Authors:  Vishesh Khanna; A V Gurava Reddy; Deepesh Daultani; Sukesh Rao Sankineani; Jai Khanna; Adarsh Annapareddy; Krishna Kiran Eachampati
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-04

2.  Minimal clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits for Knee Society Scores.

Authors:  Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Santiago Gonzalez-Parreño; Daniel Martinez-Mendez; Francisco A Miralles-Muñoz; Fernando A Lopez-Prats
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Objectifying results in total knee arthroplasty: Is "patient satisfaction" adequate].

Authors:  C Kopkow; J Schmitt; E Haase; T Lange; K-P Günther; J Lützner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  N D Clement; D MacDonald; A H R W Simpson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The WOMAC score can be reliably used to classify patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lucy C Walker; Nick D Clement; Michelle Bardgett; David Weir; Jim Holland; Craig Gerrand; David J Deehan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Survival, functional outcome and satisfaction of first revision total knee arthroplasty at a mean eleven-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas Hecker; Hans-Jürg A Pütz; Sebastian Wangler; Frank M Klenke
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-01-18

7.  A patient's perception of their hospital stay influences the functional outcome and satisfaction of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  N D Clement; D Macdonald; R Burnett; A H R W Simpson; C R Howie
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Minimal important differences for the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and the Forgotten Joint Score-12 in total knee arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  N Holtz; D F Hamilton; J M Giesinger; B Jost; K Giesinger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Identifying Patients with Osteoarthritis at Risk of Sarcopenia using the SARC-F.

Authors:  Maggie Lovett; Ahmed Negm; George Ioannidis; Danielle Petrucelli; Mitchell Winemaker; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  Can Geriatr J       Date:  2021-03-02

10.  Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.

Authors:  Ola Rolfson; Eric Bohm; Patricia Franklin; Stephen Lyman; Geke Denissen; Jill Dawson; Jennifer Dunn; Kate Eresian Chenok; Michael Dunbar; Søren Overgaard; Göran Garellick; Anne Lübbeke
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.