Literature DB >> 23525497

Area under the cumulative SUV-volume histogram is not a viable metric of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity.

Frank J Brooks.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23525497     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-013-2381-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of a cumulative SUV-volume histogram method for parameterizing heterogeneous intratumoural FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer PET studies.

Authors:  Floris H P van Velden; Patsuree Cheebsumon; Maqsood Yaqub; Egbert F Smit; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Impact of the definition of peak standardized uptake value on quantification of treatment response.

Authors:  Matt Vanderhoek; Scott B Perlman; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes.

Authors:  I El Naqa; P Grigsby; A Apte; E Kidd; E Donnelly; D Khullar; S Chaudhari; D Yang; M Schmitt; Richard Laforest; W Thorstad; J O Deasy
Journal:  Pattern Recognit       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 7.740

4.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ronald Boellaard; Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  Reply to: Area under the cumulative SUV-volume histogram is not a viable metric of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Floris H P van Velden; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Area under the cumulative SUV-volume histogram is not a viable metric of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity: further comments.

Authors:  Frank J Brooks
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Effects of reusing baseline volumes of interest by applying (non-)rigid image registration on positron emission tomography response assessments.

Authors:  Floris H P van Velden; Ida A Nissen; Wendy Hayes; Linda M Velasquez; Otto S Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  FDG uptake heterogeneity in FIGO IIb cervical carcinoma does not predict pelvic lymph node involvement.

Authors:  Frank J Brooks; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Current status of Radiomics for cancer management: Challenges versus opportunities for clinical practice.

Authors:  Hua Li; Issam El Naqa; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.