Literature DB >> 23524928

Core personal competencies important to entering students' success in medical school: what are they and how could they be assessed early in the admission process?

Thomas W Koenig1, Samuel K Parrish, Carol A Terregino, Joy P Williams, Dana M Dunleavy, Joseph M Volsch.   

Abstract

Assessing applicants' personal competencies in the admission process has proven difficult because there is not an agreed-on set of personal competencies for entering medical students. In addition, there are questions about the measurement properties and costs of currently available assessment tools. The Association of American Medical College's Innovation Lab Working Group (ILWG) and Admissions Initiative therefore engaged in a multistep, multiyear process to identify personal competencies important to entering students' success in medical school as well as ways to measure them early in the admission process. To identify core personal competencies, they conducted literature reviews, surveyed U.S and Canadian medical school admission officers, and solicited input from the admission community. To identify tools with the potential to provide data in time for pre-interview screening, they reviewed the higher education and employment literature and evaluated tools' psychometric properties, group differences, risk of coaching/faking, likely applicant and admission officer reactions, costs, and scalability. This process resulted in a list of nine core personal competencies rated by stakeholders as very or extremely important for entering medical students: ethical responsibility to self and others; reliability and dependability; service orientation; social skills; capacity for improvement; resilience and adaptability; cultural competence; oral communication; and teamwork. The ILWG's research suggests that some tools hold promise for assessing personal competencies, but the authors caution that none are perfect for all situations. They recommend that multiple tools be used to evaluate information about applicants' personal competencies in deciding whom to interview.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23524928     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828b3389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  23 in total

1.  Student Perspectives on the Impact of an Undergraduate Work-Integrated Learning Program on Admission and Transition to Medical School.

Authors:  Rachel McDonald; Adam Bobrowski; Leah Drost; Leigha Rowbottom; Judene Pretti; Hany Soliman; Stephanie Chan; Edward Chow
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  US Dermatology Department Faculty Diversity Trends by Sex and Underrepresented-in-Medicine Status, 1970 to 2018.

Authors:  Imam M Xierali; Marc A Nivet; Amit G Pandya
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  Undergraduate Premedical Student Perceptions of an Emergency Department-Based Social Needs Screening Program.

Authors:  Hursuong Vongsachang; Sachi Oshima; Christine Nguyen; Suzanne Gaulocher; N Ewen Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-03-10

Review 4.  Evaluating the Whole Applicant: Use of Situational Judgment Testing and Personality Testing to Address Disparities in Resident Selection.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Takacs; Chad R Tracy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.862

Review 5.  Review of Grit and Resilience Literature within Health Professions Education.

Authors:  Jaclyn M Stoffel; Jeff Cain
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Predictive factors of quality of life among medical students: results from a multicentric study.

Authors:  Alice de Queiroz Constantino Miguel; Patricia Tempski; Renata Kobayasi; Fernanda B Mayer; Milton A Martins
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2021-02-25

7.  Relationship among Medical Student Resilience, Educational Environment and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Patricia Tempski; Itamar S Santos; Fernanda B Mayer; Sylvia C Enns; Bruno Perotta; Helena B M S Paro; Silmar Gannam; Munique Peleias; Vera Lucia Garcia; Sergio Baldassin; Katia B Guimaraes; Nilson R Silva; Emirene M T Navarro da Cruz; Luis F Tofoli; Paulo S P Silveira; Milton A Martins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions.

Authors:  Adrian Husbands; Mark J Rodgerson; Jon Dowell; Fiona Patterson
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Personal profile of medical students selected through a knowledge-based exam only: are we missing suitable students?

Authors:  Milena Abbiati; Anne Baroffio; Margaret W Gerbase
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-04-12

10.  Medical educational culture: introducing patients to applicants as part of the medical school interview: feasibility and initial impact show and tell.

Authors:  Shireen Madani Sims; James W Lynch
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.