Tomoko Maeda-Chubachi1, Katherine Chi-Burris, Brad Simons, Dominique Brémond-Gignac, Sharon Freedman, Peng T Khaw, Barbara Wirostko, Eric Yan. 1. *Pfizer Inc., New London, CT †Pfizer Inc., La Jolla, CA ‡Private Practice, Jupiter, FL §Pediatric Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital of Amiens, INSERM UMRS 968, France ∥Duke Eye Center, Durham, NC ¶NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital & UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom #Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of age, glaucoma-specific diagnosis, and history of prior glaucoma surgery on outcomes in pediatric patients treated withlatanoprost monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, randomized, double-masked 12-week, multicenter study included individuals 18 years or younger with glaucoma. Subjects stratified by age (0 to <3, 3 to <12, 12 to 18 y), diagnosis [primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) vs. non-PCG], and baseline intraocular pressure (IOP; 22 to <27, 27 to 31, >31 mm Hg), and randomized (1:1) to latanoprost vehicle (8 AM) and latanoprost 0.005% (8 PM) or timolol 0.5% (or 0.25% for those less than 3 y old; 8 AM/8 PM). IOP and safety assessments performed and adverse events recorded at baseline, weeks 1, 4, 12. Post hoc analyses in age-specific and diagnosis-specific groups of latanoprost-treated subjects were conducted (intent-to-treat population). RESULTS:Sixty-eight subjects were treated withlatanoprost (0 to <3, n=17; 3 to <12, n=26; 12 to 18, n=25); 82%, 42%, and 24%, respectively, had a primary diagnosis of PCG. Among Non-PCG subjects, 0% (0/3), 47% (7/15), and 63% (12/19) had a primary diagnosis of juvenile open-angle glaucoma in the 0 to <3, 3 to <12, and 12 to 18 year cohorts, respectively. Mean percent IOP reductions from baseline at week 12 were 22%, 24%, and 30% in the youngest through oldest age groups, respectively (P=0.3600). At week 12, a higher responder rate (≥15% IOP reduction) was observed in the non-PCG than in the PCG group (70% vs. 45%, respectively; P=0.0361). Latanoprost was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: All age and diagnosis subgroups showed clinically relevant (>20%) mean IOP reduction at week 12 with latanoprost monotherapy.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of age, glaucoma-specific diagnosis, and history of prior glaucoma surgery on outcomes in pediatric patients treated with latanoprost monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, randomized, double-masked 12-week, multicenter study included individuals 18 years or younger with glaucoma. Subjects stratified by age (0 to <3, 3 to <12, 12 to 18 y), diagnosis [primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) vs. non-PCG], and baseline intraocular pressure (IOP; 22 to <27, 27 to 31, >31 mm Hg), and randomized (1:1) to latanoprost vehicle (8 AM) and latanoprost 0.005% (8 PM) or timolol 0.5% (or 0.25% for those less than 3 y old; 8 AM/8 PM). IOP and safety assessments performed and adverse events recorded at baseline, weeks 1, 4, 12. Post hoc analyses in age-specific and diagnosis-specific groups of latanoprost-treated subjects were conducted (intent-to-treat population). RESULTS: Sixty-eight subjects were treated with latanoprost (0 to <3, n=17; 3 to <12, n=26; 12 to 18, n=25); 82%, 42%, and 24%, respectively, had a primary diagnosis of PCG. Among Non-PCG subjects, 0% (0/3), 47% (7/15), and 63% (12/19) had a primary diagnosis of juvenile open-angle glaucoma in the 0 to <3, 3 to <12, and 12 to 18 year cohorts, respectively. Mean percent IOP reductions from baseline at week 12 were 22%, 24%, and 30% in the youngest through oldest age groups, respectively (P=0.3600). At week 12, a higher responder rate (≥15% IOP reduction) was observed in the non-PCG than in the PCG group (70% vs. 45%, respectively; P=0.0361). Latanoprost was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: All age and diagnosis subgroups showed clinically relevant (>20%) mean IOP reduction at week 12 with latanoprost monotherapy.
Authors: Cassandra L Hays; Kingsley C Okafor; Shan Fan; Robin High; Dhirendra P Singh; Carol B Toris Journal: J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 2.671
Authors: M G Uva; T Avitabile; M Reibaldi; C Bucolo; F Drago; L Quaranta; E Lionetti; A Longo Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 3.775