Literature DB >> 23524734

Piezosurgery for the lingual split technique in mandibular third molar removal: a suggestion.

Roberto Pippi1, Roberto Alvaro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lingual split technique is a surgical procedure for extraction of impacted mandibular third molar throughout a lingual approach. The main disadvantage of this technique is the high rate of temporary lingual nerve injury mainly because of the trauma induced by the lingual flap retraction. The purpose of this paper is to suggest the use of piezosurgery in performing the lingual cortical plate osteotomy of the third molar alveolar process.
METHODS: Surgical procedure was performed under general anesthesia, and it lasted approximately 60 minutes. After the buccal and lingual full-thickness flaps were incised and elevated, a piezosurgical device was used for osteotomy. A well-defined bony window was then removed, and it allowed the entire tooth was extracted in a lingual direction. The patient did not show any neurological postoperative complication. Lingual and inferior alveolar nerve functionality was normal before as well as after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of piezoelectric surgery seems to be a good option in removing lower third molars when a lingual access is clearly indicated. The only disadvantage of this technique can be represented by an operating time lengthening possibly because of a lower power cut of the piezoelectric device, to the high mineralization of the mandibular cortical bone and to the use of inserts with a low degree of sharpening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23524734     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826463f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  8 in total

1.  Prevention of neurological injuries during mandibular third molar surgery: technical notes.

Authors:  Gerardo La Monaca; Iole Vozza; Rita Giardino; Susanna Annibali; Nicola Pranno; Maria Paola Cristalli
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2017-11-08

2.  Direct Sinus Lift and Immediate Implant Placement Using Piezosurgical Approach- A Case Report.

Authors:  Sahana Purushotham; Arjun Machingal Raveendran; Bekal Kavitha Kripalani; Melba Lisa D'Souza
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

3.  A prospective split-mouth clinical study: comparison of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments in impacted third molar surgery.

Authors:  Dilek Menziletoglu; Funda Basturk; Bozkurt Kubilay Isik; Alparslan Esen
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-12-07

4.  Piezosurgery for the Lingual Split Technique in Lingual Positioned Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Removal: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Jing Ge; Chi Yang; Jiawei Zheng; Wentao Qian
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Use of piezoelectric surgery and Er:YAG laser:which one is more effective during impacted third molar surgery?

Authors:  Seied Omid Keyhan; Hamid Reza Fallahi; Behzad Cheshmi; Sajad Mokhtari; Dana Zandian; Parisa Yousefi
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-08-06

6.  A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Piezo Versus Conventional Rotary Surgery for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.

Authors:  Joana Saraiva Amaral; Carlos Miguel Marto; João Farias; Daniela Alves Pereira; Jorge Ermida; Álvaro Banaco; António Campos Felino; Francisco Caramelo; Sérgio Matos
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-25

Review 7.  Piezosurgery in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Stefan Stübinger; Andres Stricker; Britt-Isabelle Berg
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2015-11-11

Review 8.  Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Qian Jiang; Yating Qiu; Chi Yang; Jingyun Yang; Minjie Chen; Zhiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.