BACKGROUND: To improve patients' quality of life (QoL) we need to identify modifiable determinants, such as illness perceptions. Patients' illness perceptions are known to regulate emotional responses and health-behaviour. Illness perceptions comprise several components: consequences, control, coherence, changeability and emotional representations. AIMS: To examine (a) the relation between patient characteristics and illness perceptions, and (b) the independent predictive value of illness perceptions for future QoL. METHODS: A longitudinal study in 845 patients with congenital heart disease was conducted. Patients completed three questionnaires: the IPQ-R (illness perceptions) and two years later the SF-36 and TAAQOL-CHD (QoL). Linear regression analyses were performed relating illness perceptions to patient characteristics (sex, age, disease complexity and functional status) and QoL. RESULTS: Patients with a complex defect or poor functional status reported poor illness perceptions. Independent of patient characteristics, poor illness perceptions (i.e. a strong belief that the illness has severe consequences; a weak belief that you have a coherent illness understanding and that the illness can be controlled by treatment; and a strong belief that the illness is changeable and causes negative emotions) were predictive of future QoL. CONCLUSION: Illness perceptions independently predict QoL, suggesting that QoL may be improved by altering patients' beliefs about their illness. For example, increasing patients' knowledge regarding their disease and informing them about treatment opportunities may enhance their QoL.
BACKGROUND: To improve patients' quality of life (QoL) we need to identify modifiable determinants, such as illness perceptions. Patients' illness perceptions are known to regulate emotional responses and health-behaviour. Illness perceptions comprise several components: consequences, control, coherence, changeability and emotional representations. AIMS: To examine (a) the relation between patient characteristics and illness perceptions, and (b) the independent predictive value of illness perceptions for future QoL. METHODS: A longitudinal study in 845 patients with congenital heart disease was conducted. Patients completed three questionnaires: the IPQ-R (illness perceptions) and two years later the SF-36 and TAAQOL-CHD (QoL). Linear regression analyses were performed relating illness perceptions to patient characteristics (sex, age, disease complexity and functional status) and QoL. RESULTS: Patients with a complex defect or poor functional status reported poor illness perceptions. Independent of patient characteristics, poor illness perceptions (i.e. a strong belief that the illness has severe consequences; a weak belief that you have a coherent illness understanding and that the illness can be controlled by treatment; and a strong belief that the illness is changeable and causes negative emotions) were predictive of future QoL. CONCLUSION: Illness perceptions independently predict QoL, suggesting that QoL may be improved by altering patients' beliefs about their illness. For example, increasing patients' knowledge regarding their disease and informing them about treatment opportunities may enhance their QoL.
Entities:
Keywords:
Congenital heart disease; illness perceptions; quality of life
Authors: Ari M Cedars; Ada Stefanescu Schmidt; Craig Broberg; Ali Zaidi; Alexander Opotowsky; Jasmine Grewal; Joseph Kay; Ami B Bhatt; Eric Novak; John Spertus Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2016-03-08
Authors: Werner Budts; Jolien Roos-Hesselink; Tanja Rädle-Hurst; Andreas Eicken; Theresa A McDonagh; Ekaterini Lambrinou; Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Fiona Walker; Alexandra A Frogoudaki Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Christina E Holbein; Nicholas D Fogleman; Kevin Hommel; Silke Apers; Jessica Rassart; Philip Moons; Koen Luyckx; Maayke A Sluman; Junko Enomoto; Bengt Johansson; Hsiao-Ling Yang; Mikael Dellborg; Raghavan Subramanyan; Jamie L Jackson; Werner Budts; Adrienne H Kovacs; Stacey Morrison; Martha Tomlin; Kathy Gosney; Alexandra Soufi; Katrine Eriksen; Corina Thomet; Malin Berghammer; Luis Alday; Edward Callus; Susan M Fernandes; Maryanne Caruana; Samuel Menahem; Stephen C Cook; Gwen R Rempel; Kamila White; Paul Khairy; Shelby Kutty; Gruschen Veldtman Journal: Congenit Heart Dis Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 2.007
Authors: Michelle Gurvitz; Julie E Dunn; Ami Bhatt; Wendy M Book; Jill Glidewell; Carol Hogue; Angela E Lin; George Lui; Claire McGarry; Cheryl Raskind-Hood; Alissa Van Zutphen; Ali Zaidi; Kathy Jenkins; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 27.203
Authors: Dounya Schoormans; Jingmei Li; Hatef Darabi; Yvonne Brandberg; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Mikael Eriksson; Koos H Zwinderman; Per Hall Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dounya Schoormans; Hatef Darabi; Jingmei Li; Yvonne Brandberg; Mikael Eriksson; Koos H Zwinderman; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Per Hall Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tessa N A Slagboom; Jan Berend Deijen; Christa C Van Bunderen; Hans A Knoop; Madeleine L Drent Journal: Pituitary Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 4.107