Literature DB >> 23524444

Uncovering the mechanisms that regulate tumor-induced T-cell anergy.

Brian T Abe1, Fernando Macian.   

Abstract

Helper T cells become hyporesponsive in the tumor microenvironment (at least in part) owing to the NFAT1-dependent expression of anergy-associated genes. Anergy constitutes a crucial mechanism to prevent tumor destruction by T cells, and hence may represent a powerful target to boost antitumor immune responses and improve the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NFAT; T helper cell; anergy; immune evasion; melanoma

Year:  2013        PMID: 23524444      PMCID: PMC3601153          DOI: 10.4161/onci.22679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


The tumor microenvironment often promotes immunosuppression, due to (1) the recruitment of cell populations with suppressive capabilities (e.g., regulatory T cells or myeloid-derived suppressor cells); (2) the production by different cell types of immunosuppressive molecules (e.g., TGFβ, IL-10, indoleamine 2,3-deoxygenase) and (3) the expression of ligands that activate inhibitory receptors (e.g., CTLA-4 or PD-1). Altogether, these processes prevent the development of effective antitumor immune responses and constitute an obstacle against the generation of efficient cancer vaccines. T cells are one of the main targets of the tumor-associated immunosuppressive microenvironment. One of the mechanisms that can render tumor antigen-specific responses inefficient is anergy. Anergy in T cells has been described as a process of self-inactivation that results from T-cell receptor (TCR) activation in the absence of appropriate co-stimulation, e.g., via CD28. In the past 10 years, we have started to unravel the complex mechanisms that are responsible for the induction and maintenance of anergy in T cells. Several forms of T-cell anergy have been described, each occurring under specific conditions and in response to different kinds of stimuli. For instance, clonal anergy has been extensively characterized in vitro and is caused by the activation of a NFAT-dependent program of gene expression that is regulated by specific NFAT-containing transcriptional complexes and leads to the synthesis of negative regulators of TCR signaling and silencers of cytokine expression. Other forms of T-cell anergy respond to different stimuli and are characterized by a different set of signaling alterations. For instance, adaptive tolerance develops when self-reactive T cells are transferred into lymphopenic hosts and is characterized by inhibition of TCR signaling due to defective ZAP70 activity. Despite this in-depth characterization of the mechanisms that control T-cell responsiveness, the specific roles that various forms of T-cell anergy play in distinct physiological or pathological situations to regulate T-cell reactivity remain largely uncharacterized. Anergy has been reported to occur in T cells that infiltrate tumors, and the immunosuppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment is thought to be responsible for this effect. In particular, the lack of dendritic cell maturation appears to account for an inefficient presentation of tumor antigens (Fig. 1). In turn, suboptimally presented antigens, presumably due to the presence of inhibitory signaling and/or poor co-stimulation, would lead to the induction of T-cell anergy. This process has been shown to affect both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell populations, in both solid and hematological tumors.,

Figure 1. Tumor-induced helper T-cell anergy. The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment induces anergy in helper T cells through the NFAT-dependent expression of anergy-inducing genes, coding for proteins that can inhibit TCR signaling and silence cytokine expression. The activation of this program can be caused by interferences with dendritic cell (DC) maturation, which might result in defective co-stimulation, although a direct role for other cells in the tumor microenvironment cannot be excluded. Anergic CD4+ T cells cannot efficiently “help” CD8+ T-cell antitumor responses, allowing cancer cells to escape CD8+ T cell-mediated lytic responses.

Figure 1. Tumor-induced helper T-cell anergy. The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment induces anergy in helper T cells through the NFAT-dependent expression of anergy-inducing genes, coding for proteins that can inhibit TCR signaling and silence cytokine expression. The activation of this program can be caused by interferences with dendritic cell (DC) maturation, which might result in defective co-stimulation, although a direct role for other cells in the tumor microenvironment cannot be excluded. Anergic CD4+ T cells cannot efficiently “help” CD8+ T-cell antitumor responses, allowing cancer cells to escape CD8+ T cell-mediated lytic responses. Using a model of melanoma (B16), we have shown that tumor antigen-specific CD4+ T cells become anergic as a result of the expression of genes that have been previously characterized as part of the program that regulates clonal anergy in helper T cells. Using mice whose T cells expressed a transgenic TCR specific for ovalbumin (expressed by B16 cells as a model antigen), we could detect that anergy is established in helper T cells in a tumor antigen-specific way that results in diminished proliferative responses and decreased IL-2, IFNγ and IL-17 production by tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes and T cells isolated from tumor-draining lymph nodes. Interestingly, these cells upregulated the expression of several clonal anergy-associated genes, including Grail, Itch, Egr2 or Casp3, suggesting that a process related to clonal anergy is responsible for the inactivation of helper T cells in the tumor microenvironment. In an attempt to characterize this process, we used animals deficient in NFAT1, the transcription factor that regulates the expression of anergy-associated genes in T cells. Confirming our results, the lack of NFAT1 prevented the expression of anergy genes, and Nfat1−/− T cells failed to become anergic in B16 melanoma-bearing animals. One of the questions that remained unanswered by previous models was to what extent anergy contributes to the overall process of tumor escape from T cell responses. Interestingly, NFAT1 deficiency does not seem to have a marked effect on T-cell activation, possibly due to a compensatory effect by NFAT2. Nevertheless, Nfat1−/− T cells are less susceptible to anergizing stimuli., As NFAT1-deficient cells can mount T-cell responses but fail to normally undergo anergy, we used this model as a tool to evaluate the relative contribution of helper T-cell anergy to tumor immune escape. Mice bearing anergy-resistant T cells were able to control tumor growth more efficiently than their wild type counterparts, which was reflected by a reduced tumor growth rate and hence in a delayed appearance of detectable melanoma lesions. This process was dependent of CD8+ cells and likely reflected the ability of NFAT1-deficient cells to provide efficient help to tumor-specific CD8+ T-cell populations. However, this benefit was eventually overcome, allowing tumors to grow. These results indicate that, as previously proposed, anergy occurs early during the establishment of antitumor T-cell responses, and that other immunosuppressive mechanisms are activated later during tumor progression to inhibit antitumor T-cell responses. Our results demonstrate that the NFAT-regulated expression of anergy-associated genes is responsible for the induction of tumor-antigen specific helper T cell anergy (Fig. 1) and that this process significantly limits antitumor T cell responses and promotes immune evasion early in the oncogenic process. Several therapeutic approaches have been analyzed to boost antitumor responses, ranging from the blockade of inhibitory receptors to the adoptive transfer of antigen-specific T cells. We propose that inhibiting anergy by targeting specific NFAT complexes or the downstream genes may represent a powerful means to boost antitumor T cell responses and increase the efficacy of immunotherapeutic approaches.
  10 in total

1.  Adaptive tolerance and clonal anergy are distinct biochemical states.

Authors:  Lynda Chiodetti; Seeyoung Choi; Daniel L Barber; Ronald H Schwartz
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Inhibition of antigen-specific proliferation of type 1 murine T cell clones after stimulation with immobilized anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  M K Jenkins; C A Chen; G Jung; D L Mueller; R H Schwartz
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1990-01-01       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Induction of antigen-specific T cell anergy: An early event in the course of tumor progression.

Authors:  K Staveley-O'Carroll; E Sotomayor; J Montgomery; I Borrello; L Hwang; S Fein; D Pardoll; H Levitsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cross-presentation of tumor antigens by bone marrow-derived antigen-presenting cells is the dominant mechanism in the induction of T-cell tolerance during B-cell lymphoma progression.

Authors:  E M Sotomayor; I Borrello; F M Rattis; A G Cuenca; J Abrams; K Staveley-O'Carroll; H I Levitsky
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Failure at the effector phase: immune barriers at the level of the melanoma tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Thomas F Gajewski
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Activation-induced non-responsiveness (anergy) limits CD8 T cell responses to tumors.

Authors:  Matthew F Mescher; Flavia E Popescu; Michael Gerner; Chris D Hammerbeck; Julie M Curtsinger
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 15.707

7.  NFAT1 supports tumor-induced anergy of CD4(+) T cells.

Authors:  Brian T Abe; Daniel S Shin; Enric Mocholi; Fernando Macian
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Transcriptional mechanisms underlying lymphocyte tolerance.

Authors:  Fernando Macián; Francisco García-Cózar; Sin-Hyeog Im; Heidi F Horton; Michael C Byrne; Anjana Rao
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Extra-lymphatic solid tumor growth is not immunologically ignored and results in early induction of antigen-specific T-cell anergy: dominant role of cross-tolerance to tumor antigens.

Authors:  Alex Cuenca; Fengdong Cheng; Hongwei Wang; Jason Brayer; Pedro Horna; Lingping Gu; Harold Bien; Ivan M Borrello; Hyam I Levitsky; Eduardo M Sotomayor
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Transcriptional complexes formed by NFAT dimers regulate the induction of T cell tolerance.

Authors:  Noemi Soto-Nieves; Irene Puga; Brian T Abe; Sanmay Bandyopadhyay; Ian Baine; Anjana Rao; Fernando Macian
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 14.307

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  NFAT1 Directly Regulates IL8 and MMP3 to Promote Melanoma Tumor Growth and Metastasis.

Authors:  Einav Shoshan; Russell R Braeuer; Takafumi Kamiya; Aaron K Mobley; Li Huang; Mayra E Vasquez; Guermarie Velazquez-Torres; Nitin Chakravarti; Cristina Ivan; Victor Prieto; Gabriel J Villares; Menashe Bar-Eli
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Engineering of a trispecific tumor-targeted immunotherapy incorporating 4-1BB co-stimulation and PD-L1 blockade.

Authors:  Stefan Warmuth; Tea Gunde; Daniel Snell; Matthias Brock; Christopher Weinert; Alexandre Simonin; Christian Hess; Julia Tietz; Maria Johansson; Fabio Mario Spiga; Robin Heiz; Naomi Flückiger; Sandro Wagen; Julia Zeberer; Dania Diem; Dana Mahler; Belinda Wickihalder; Simone Muntwiler; Bithi Chatterjee; Benjamin Küttner; Bettina Bommer; Yasemin Yaman; Peter Lichtlen; David Urech
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 7.723

3.  The double-edged sword of cancer mutations: exploiting neoepitopes for the fight against cancer.

Authors:  Isabel Alvarado-Cruz; Rithy Meas; Sesha Lakshmi Arathi Paluri; Kelly Estelle Wheeler Carufe; Mohammed Khan; Joann Balazs Sweasy
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  An Altered gp100 Peptide Ligand with Decreased Binding by TCR and CD8α Dissects T Cell Cytotoxicity from Production of Cytokines and Activation of NFAT.

Authors:  Niels Schaft; Miriam Coccoris; Joost Drexhage; Christiaan Knoop; I Jolanda M de Vries; Gosse J Adema; Reno Debets
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  T lymphocytes as dynamic regulators of glioma pathobiology.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Cordell; Mahmoud S Alghamri; Maria G Castro; David H Gutmann
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 13.029

Review 6.  Classification of current anticancer immunotherapies.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Erika Vacchelli; José-Manuel Bravo-San Pedro; Aitziber Buqué; Laura Senovilla; Elisa Elena Baracco; Norma Bloy; Francesca Castoldi; Jean-Pierre Abastado; Patrizia Agostinis; Ron N Apte; Fernando Aranda; Maha Ayyoub; Philipp Beckhove; Jean-Yves Blay; Laura Bracci; Anne Caignard; Chiara Castelli; Federica Cavallo; Estaban Celis; Vincenzo Cerundolo; Aled Clayton; Mario P Colombo; Lisa Coussens; Madhav V Dhodapkar; Alexander M Eggermont; Douglas T Fearon; Wolf H Fridman; Jitka Fučíková; Dmitry I Gabrilovich; Jérôme Galon; Abhishek Garg; François Ghiringhelli; Giuseppe Giaccone; Eli Gilboa; Sacha Gnjatic; Axel Hoos; Anne Hosmalin; Dirk Jäger; Pawel Kalinski; Klas Kärre; Oliver Kepp; Rolf Kiessling; John M Kirkwood; Eva Klein; Alexander Knuth; Claire E Lewis; Roland Liblau; Michael T Lotze; Enrico Lugli; Jean-Pierre Mach; Fabrizio Mattei; Domenico Mavilio; Ignacio Melero; Cornelis J Melief; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Lorenzo Moretta; Adekunke Odunsi; Hideho Okada; Anna Karolina Palucka; Marcus E Peter; Kenneth J Pienta; Angel Porgador; George C Prendergast; Gabriel A Rabinovich; Nicholas P Restifo; Naiyer Rizvi; Catherine Sautès-Fridman; Hans Schreiber; Barbara Seliger; Hiroshi Shiku; Bruno Silva-Santos; Mark J Smyth; Daniel E Speiser; Radek Spisek; Pramod K Srivastava; James E Talmadge; Eric Tartour; Sjoerd H Van Der Burg; Benoît J Van Den Eynde; Richard Vile; Hermann Wagner; Jeffrey S Weber; Theresa L Whiteside; Jedd D Wolchok; Laurence Zitvogel; Weiping Zou; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-12-30

Review 7.  Diacylglycerol Kinases in T Cell Tolerance and Effector Function.

Authors:  Shelley S Chen; Zhiming Hu; Xiao-Ping Zhong
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2016-11-10

Review 8.  (Im)maturity in Tumor Ecosystem.

Authors:  Keywan Mortezaee; Jamal Majidpoor
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  CD8+ T Cells in SARS-CoV-2 Induced Disease and Cancer-Clinical Perspectives.

Authors:  Keywan Mortezaee; Jamal Majidpoor
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 10.  Revising PTEN in the Era of Immunotherapy: New Perspectives for an Old Story.

Authors:  Geny Piro; Carmine Carbone; Luisa Carbognin; Sara Pilotto; Chiara Ciccarese; Roberto Iacovelli; Michele Milella; Emilio Bria; Giampaolo Tortora
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 6.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.