Literature DB >> 23523928

Salvage surgery after failed treatment of synthetic mesh sling complications.

Jerry G Blaivas1, Rajveer S Purohit, James M Weinberger, Johnson F Tsui, Jyoti Chouhan, Ruhee Sidhu, Kamron Saleem.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We report our experience with the diagnosis and treatment of refractory synthetic sling complications in women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of consecutive women with failed treatments for mesh sling complications. Before and after surgery the patients completed validated questionnaires and voiding diaries, and underwent uroflow with post-void residuals, pad test, cystourethroscopy and videourodynamic studies. Treatment was individualized, and results were subdivided into the 2 groups of conditions and symptoms. Outcomes were assessed with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement with success classified as a score of 1, improvement as 2 to 3 and failure as 4 to 7.
RESULTS: A total of 47 women 35 to 83 years old (mean 60) had undergone at least 1 prior operation (range 1 to 4) to correct sling complications. Original sling composition was type 1 mesh in 36 patients and types 2 and 3 in 11. Surgical procedures included sling incision, sling excision, urethrolysis, urethral reconstruction, ureteroneocystotomy, cystectomy and urinary diversion, and enterocystoplasty. Median followup was 2 years (range 0.25 to 12, mean 3). Overall a successful outcome was achieved in 34 of 47 patients (72%) after the first salvage surgery. Reasons for failure were multiple for each patient. Of the 13 patients with treatment failure 9 subsequently underwent 14 operations. Success/improvement was achieved in 5 women (56%) after continent urinary diversion (1), continent urinary diversion and cystectomy (1), partial cystectomy and augmentation cystoplasty (1), biological sling and sinus tract excision (1), and vaginal mesh excision (1).
CONCLUSIONS: Success after the initial failure of mesh sling complications repair is possible but multiple surgeries may be required. Each symptom should be addressed separately.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LUTSS; Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score; OAB; PGI-I; Patient Global Impression of Improvement; Qmax; SUI; TOT; TVT®; UTI; maximum flow rate; overactive bladder; postoperative complications; salvage therapy; stress urinary incontinence; suburethral slings; surgical mesh; tension-free vaginal tape; transobturator tape; urinary incontinence; urinary tract infection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23523928     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

1.  Functional outcomes of synthetic tape and mesh revision surgeries: a monocentric experience.

Authors:  Salima Ismail; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Christine Reus; Jérémy Cohen; Thomas Seisen; Véronique Phé
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Management of Mesh Complications after SUI and POP Repair: Review and Analysis of the Current Literature.

Authors:  D Barski; D Y Deng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Recurrent Incontinence After Transvaginal Partial Sling Excision in Patients with Prior Mid-Urethral Sling.

Authors:  Robert Shapiro; Omar Felipe Dueñas-Garcia; Manuel Vallejo; Tyler Trump; Makenzy Sufficool; Stanley Zaslau
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-01-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.