Literature DB >> 23523674

Delayed versus immediate treatment for patients with acute hepatitis C: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

Katja Deterding1, Norbert Grüner, Peter Buggisch, Johannes Wiegand, Peter R Galle, Ulrich Spengler, Holger Hinrichsen, Thomas Berg, Andrej Potthoff, Nisar Malek, Anika Großhennig, Armin Koch, Helmut Diepolder, Stefan Lüth, Sandra Feyerabend, Maria Christina Jung, Magdalena Rogalska-Taranta, Verena Schlaphoff, Markus Cornberg, Michael P Manns, Heiner Wedemeyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early treatment of acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with interferon alfa monotherapy is very effective, with cure rates of greater than 85%. However, spontaneous clearance of HCV occurs in 10-50% of cases. We aimed to assess an alternative treatment strategy of delayed antiviral therapy in patients who do not eliminate the virus spontaneously compared with immediate treatment.
METHODS: In our open-label phase 3 non-inferiority trial, we enrolled adults (≥18 years) with acute hepatitis C but no HIV or hepatitis B co-infection at 72 centres in Germany. We randomly allocated patients with symptomatic acute hepatitis C (1:1) to receive immediate pegylated interferon alfa-2b treatment for 24 weeks or delayed treatment with pegylated interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin (for 24 weeks) starting 12 weeks after randomisation if HCV RNA remained positive. We used a computer-generated randomisation sequence and block sizes of eight, stratified by bilirubin concentration. We assigned all asymptomatic patients to immediate treatment with pegylated interferon alfa-2b for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained HCV RNA negativity in all randomly allocated participants who completed screening (intention-to-treat analysis), with a non-inferiority margin of 10%. For the primary analysis, we calculated the virological response of patients in the immediate and delayed treatment groups and an absolute risk difference stratified by bilirubin status. The trial was stopped early on advice from the study advisory committee because of slow recruitment of participants. This study is registered, number ISRCTN88729946.
FINDINGS: Between April, 2004, and February, 2010, we recruited 107 symptomatic and 25 asymptomatic patients. 37 (67%) of 55 symptomatic patients randomly allocated to receive immediate treatment and 28 (54%) of 52 symptomatic patients randomly allocated to receive delayed treatment had a sustained virological response (difference 13·7%, 95% CI -4·6 to 32·0; p=0·071). 18 (72%) of 25 asymptomatic patients had a sustained virological response. 22 (42%) of 52 symptomatic patients allocated to receive delayed treatment did not complete follow-up compared with 20 (25%) of 80 symptomatic or asymptomatic patients assigned immediate treatment (p=0·037). 11 symptomatic patients (21%) assigned delayed treatment had spontaneous HCV clearance. 14 patients who received delayed pegylated interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin treatment and completed follow-up achieved sustained virological response.
INTERPRETATION: Delayed treatment is effective although not of equal efficacy to immediate treatment; coupled with the rate of spontaneous clearance it can reduce unnecessary treatment in closely monitored populations. Immediate treatment seems preferable in populations where loss to follow-up is great. FUNDING: German Network of Competence on Viral Hepatitis (HepNet, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, grants 01KI0102, 01KI0401, and 01KI0601), MSD, Schering-Plough.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23523674     DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70059-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


  34 in total

Review 1.  Acute HCV in HIV-infected MSM: modes of acquisition, liver fibrosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Emma Kaplan-Lewis; Daniel Seth Fierer
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.071

2.  A SPECIAL MEETING REVIEW EDITION: Advances in the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection From the 2016 EASL Meeting: The Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver • April 13-17, 2016 • Barcelona, SpainSpecial Reporting on:• Six Weeks of Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) Are Sufficient to Treat Acute Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Monoinfection: The HepNet Acute HCV IV Study• Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus in Patients With Advanced Cirrhosis: Always Justified? Analysis of the HEPA-C Registry• High Efficacy of Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Plus GS-9857 in Previously Treated Patients With HCV Genotypes 1 Through 6• Prevalence and Impact of Baseline Resistance-Associated Variants (RAVs) on the Efficacy of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir or Simeprevir/Sofosbuvir Against GT1 HCV Infection: HCV-TARGET Interim Analysis• Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir for 12 Weeks in Patients Coinfected With HCV and HIV-1: The ASTRAL-5 Study• 100% SVR12 With ABT-493 and ABT-530 With or Without Ribavirin in Treatment-Naive HCV Genotype 3-Infected Patients With CirrhosisPLUS Meeting Abstract SummariesWith Expert Commentary by:Steven L. Flamm, MDChief, Liver Transplantation ProgramProfessor of Medicine and SurgeryNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicago, Illinois.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2016-06

Review 3.  Treatment decisions and contemporary versus pending treatments for hepatitis C.

Authors:  Paul M Trembling; Sudeep Tanwar; William M Rosenberg; Geoffrey M Dusheiko
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  Acute hepatitis C: clinical and laboratory diagnosis, course of the disease, treatment.

Authors:  E Sagnelli; T Santantonio; N Coppola; M Fasano; M Pisaturo; C Sagnelli
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 5.  KASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatitis C.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2016-03-28

Review 6.  Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) Guidance for Antiviral Therapy Against HCV Infection: Update 2016.

Authors:  Pankaj Puri; Vivek A Saraswat; Radha K Dhiman; Anil C Anand; Subrat K Acharya; Shivaram P Singh; Yogesh K Chawla; Deepak N Amarapurkar; Ajay Kumar; Anil Arora; Vinod K Dixit; Abraham Koshy; Ajit Sood; Ajay Duseja; Dharmesh Kapoor; Kaushal Madan; Anshu Srivastava; Ashish Kumar; Manav Wadhawan; Amit Goel; Abhai Verma; Gaurav Pandey; Rohan Malik; Swastik Agrawal
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2016-07-02

7.  Telaprevir in the treatment of acute hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected men.

Authors:  Daniel S Fierer; Douglas T Dieterich; Michael P Mullen; Andrea D Branch; Alison J Uriel; Damaris C Carriero; Wouter O van Seggelen; Rosanne M Hijdra; David G Cassagnol
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 8.  Hepatitis C.

Authors:  Daniel P Webster; Paul Klenerman; Geoffrey M Dusheiko
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Role of genetic polymorphisms in hepatitis C virus chronic infection.

Authors:  Nicola Coppola; Mariantonietta Pisaturo; Caterina Sagnelli; Lorenzo Onorato; Evangelista Sagnelli
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

10.  Acute hepatitis C: to treat or not to treat.

Authors:  Niharika R Samala; Marc G Ghany
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 25.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.