Ching-wan Lam1, Chloe Miu Mak. 1. Department of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, China. ching-wanlam@hk.hk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: PCR-based technology is indispensable for genetic diagnosis. On the other hand, allele dropout is one significant cause of genotyping errors. Most allele dropout mechanisms are related to annealing failure caused by single nucleotide variant (SNV) situated inside the primer sequences. Here, we demonstrate a novel allele dropout mechanism caused by a non-primer-binding-site SNV. METHODS: We demonstrate that the apparent homozygosity of NM_000137.1(FAH):c.1035_1037del was caused by allele dropout. RESULTS: The non-primer-binding-site SNV causes a strong secondary hairpin structure formation of the PCR products and leads to amplification failure. SNV check of the primer sequences per se during primer design is not adequate to avoid allele dropout. CONCLUSIONS: The next-generation primer design software should analyze the secondary structure of primers and template sequence taking SNV in both sequences into account in order to avoid genotyping errors.
BACKGROUND: PCR-based technology is indispensable for genetic diagnosis. On the other hand, allele dropout is one significant cause of genotyping errors. Most allele dropout mechanisms are related to annealing failure caused by single nucleotide variant (SNV) situated inside the primer sequences. Here, we demonstrate a novel allele dropout mechanism caused by a non-primer-binding-site SNV. METHODS: We demonstrate that the apparent homozygosity of NM_000137.1(FAH):c.1035_1037del was caused by allele dropout. RESULTS: The non-primer-binding-site SNV causes a strong secondary hairpin structure formation of the PCR products and leads to amplification failure. SNV check of the primer sequences per se during primer design is not adequate to avoid allele dropout. CONCLUSIONS: The next-generation primer design software should analyze the secondary structure of primers and template sequence taking SNV in both sequences into account in order to avoid genotyping errors.
Authors: Lucas S de Santana; Lilian A Caetano; Aline D Costa-Riquetto; Pedro C Franco; Renata P Dotto; André F Reis; Letícia S Weinert; Sandra P Silveiro; Marcio F Vendramini; Flaviene A do Prado; Giovanna C P Abrahão; Ana Gregória F P de Almeida; Maria da G Rodrigues Tavares; Wagner Rodrigo B Gonçalves; Augusto C Santomauro Junior; Bruno Halpern; Alexander A L Jorge; Marcia Nery; Milena G Teles Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 2.183
Authors: Jonas M den Heijer; Arnoud Schmitz; Peter Lansbury; Valerie C Cullen; Dana C Hilt; Vincenzo Bonifati; Geert Jan Groeneveld Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-01-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Rosina De Cario; Ada Kura; Samuele Suraci; Alberto Magi; Andrea Volta; Rossella Marcucci; Anna Maria Gori; Guglielmina Pepe; Betti Giusti; Elena Sticchi Journal: Front Genet Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 4.599