Literature DB >> 23523324

National Institutes of Health funding in radiation oncology: a snapshot.

Michael Steinberg1, William H McBride, Erina Vlashi, Frank Pajonk.   

Abstract

Currently, pay lines for National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants are at a historical low. In this climate of fierce competition, knowledge about the funding situation in a small field like radiation oncology becomes very important for career planning and recruitment of faculty. Unfortunately, these data cannot be easily extracted from the NIH's database because it does not discriminate between radiology and radiation oncology departments. At the start of fiscal year 2013 we extracted records for 952 individual grants, which were active at the time of analysis from the NIH database. Proposals originating from radiation oncology departments were identified manually. Descriptive statistics were generated using the JMP statistical software package. Our analysis identified 197 grants in radiation oncology. These proposals came from 134 individual investigators in 43 academic institutions. The majority of the grants (118) were awarded to principal investigators at the full professor level, and 122 principal investigators held a PhD degree. In 79% of the grants, the research topic fell into the field of biology, 13% in the field of medical physics. Only 7.6% of the proposals were clinical investigations. Our data suggest that the field of radiation oncology is underfunded by the NIH and that the current level of support does not match the relevance of radiation oncology for cancer patients or the potential of its academic work force.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23523324      PMCID: PMC3646925          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  1 in total

1.  Bibliometric analysis of radiation oncology departmental scholarly publication productivity at domestic residency training institutions.

Authors:  Clifton D Fuller; Mehee Choi; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.532

  1 in total
  9 in total

1.  The Future of Radiobiology.

Authors:  David G Kirsch; Max Diehn; Aparna H Kesarwala; Amit Maity; Meredith A Morgan; Julie K Schwarz; Robert Bristow; Sandra Demaria; Iris Eke; Robert J Griffin; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Geoff S Higgins; Alec C Kimmelman; Randall J Kimple; Isabelle M Lombaert; Li Ma; Brian Marples; Frank Pajonk; Catherine C Park; Dörthe Schaue; Phuoc T Tran; Eric J Bernhard
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Interaction of radiation therapy with molecular targeted agents.

Authors:  Zachary S Morris; Paul M Harari
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Promoting the Appropriate Use of Advanced Radiation Technologies in Oncology: Summary of a National Cancer Policy Forum Workshop.

Authors:  Grace L Smith; Patricia A Ganz; Justin E Bekelman; Steven J Chmura; James J Dignam; Jason A Efstathiou; Reshma Jagsi; Peter A Johnstone; Michael L Steinberg; Stephen B Williams; James B Yu; Anthony L Zietman; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Genomically Guided Breast Radiation Therapy: A Review of the Current Data and Future Directions.

Authors:  Casey L Liveringhouse; Iman R Washington; Roberto Diaz; Rachel B Jimenez; Eleanor E Harris; Rachel Rabinovitch; Wendy A Woodward; Javier F Torres-Roca; Kamran A Ahmed
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-05-28

Review 5.  Machine Learning and Radiogenomics: Lessons Learned and Future Directions.

Authors:  John Kang; Tiziana Rancati; Sangkyu Lee; Jung Hun Oh; Sarah L Kerns; Jacob G Scott; Russell Schwartz; Seyoung Kim; Barry S Rosenstein
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Three discipline collaborative radiation therapy (3DCRT) special debate: Equipment development is stifling innovation in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Leonard Kim; Stephanie Markovina; Samantha J Van Nest; Subarna Eisaman; Lakshmi Santanam; Julie M Sullivan; Michael Dominello; Michael C Joiner; Jay Burmeister
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Three Discipline Collaborative Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) special debate: In the future, at least 20% of NIH funding for radiotherapy research should be allocated to non-oncologic applications.

Authors:  Krisha Howell; Martha Matuszak; Charles A Maitz; Subarna H Eisaman; Laura Padilla; Stephen L Brown; Michael C Joiner; Michael M Dominello; Jay Burmeister
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Levels of Evidence for Radiation Therapy Recommendations in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Guidelines.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Noy; Benjamin J Rich; Ricardo Llorente; Deukwoo Kwon; Matthew Abramowitz; Brandon Mahal; Eric A Mellon; Nicholas G Zaorsky; Alan Dal Pra
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-10-29

Review 9.  Funding for radiation research: past, present and future.

Authors:  Kunwoo Cho; Tatsuhiko Imaoka; Dmitry Klokov; Tatjana Paunesku; Sisko Salomaa; Mandy Birschwilks; Simon Bouffler; Antone L Brooks; Tom K Hei; Toshiyasu Iwasaki; Tetsuya Ono; Kazuo Sakai; Andrzej Wojcik; Gayle E Woloschak; Yutaka Yamada; Nobuyuki Hamada
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.694

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.