OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of an event-related beamforming (ERB) algorithm in source localization of interictal discharges. METHODS: We analyzed interictal magnetoencephalography data in 35 children with intractable neocortical epilepsy. We used a spatiotemporal beamforming method to estimate the spatial distribution of source power in individual interictal spikes. We compared ERB results to source localization using the equivalent current dipole model and to the seizure onset zones on intracranial EEG. RESULTS: Focal beamformer localization was observed in 66% of patients and multifocal in the remaining 34%. ERB localized within 2 cm of the equivalent current dipole cluster centroid in 77% of the patients. ERB localization was concordant with the seizure onset zone on intracranial EEG at the gyral level in 69% of patients. Focal ERB localization area was included in the resection margin in 22/23 patients. However, focal ERB localization was not statistically associated with better surgical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: ERB can be used for source localization of interictal spikes and can be predictive of the ictal onset zone in a subset of patients with neocortical epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: These results support the utility of beamformer source localization as a fast semi-automated method for source localization of interictal spikes and planning the surgical strategy.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of an event-related beamforming (ERB) algorithm in source localization of interictal discharges. METHODS: We analyzed interictal magnetoencephalography data in 35 children with intractable neocortical epilepsy. We used a spatiotemporal beamforming method to estimate the spatial distribution of source power in individual interictal spikes. We compared ERB results to source localization using the equivalent current dipole model and to the seizure onset zones on intracranial EEG. RESULTS: Focal beamformer localization was observed in 66% of patients and multifocal in the remaining 34%. ERB localized within 2 cm of the equivalent current dipole cluster centroid in 77% of the patients. ERB localization was concordant with the seizure onset zone on intracranial EEG at the gyral level in 69% of patients. Focal ERB localization area was included in the resection margin in 22/23 patients. However, focal ERB localization was not statistically associated with better surgical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: ERB can be used for source localization of interictal spikes and can be predictive of the ictal onset zone in a subset of patients with neocortical epilepsy. SIGNIFICANCE: These results support the utility of beamformer source localization as a fast semi-automated method for source localization of interictal spikes and planning the surgical strategy.
Authors: Naoaki Tanaka; Christos Papadelis; Eleonora Tamilia; Michel AlHilani; Joseph R Madsen; Phillip L Pearl; Steven M Stufflebeam Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: J S Gofshteyn; T Le; S Kessler; R Kamens; C Carr; W Gaetz; L Bloy; T P L Roberts; E S Schwartz; E D Marsh Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Frank Neugebauer; Gabriel Möddel; Stefan Rampp; Martin Burger; Carsten H Wolters Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Amit Jaiswal; Jukka Nenonen; Matti Stenroos; Alexandre Gramfort; Sarang S Dalal; Britta U Westner; Vladimir Litvak; John C Mosher; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Caroline Witton; Robert Oostenveld; Lauri Parkkonen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Erika L Juárez-Martinez; Ida A Nissen; Sander Idema; Demetrios N Velis; Arjan Hillebrand; Cornelis J Stam; Elisabeth C W van Straaten Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2018-06-02 Impact factor: 4.881