BACKGROUND: Primary cervical dystonia is the most common form of adult-onset focal dystonia. Although most frequently sporadic, 15-20% of patients report a positive family history, suggesting a possible genetic cause. Head tremor is often present in patients with cervical dystonia and may be a prominent symptom. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics of patients with tremulous cervical dystonia. METHODS: Patients with primary cervical dystonia attending our botulinum toxin clinic were assessed with an interview and neurological examination and their notes reviewed. Patients were classified as having either tremulous or non-tremulous cervical dystonia, according to the presence or absence of head tremor on examination. Clinical and demographic data were compared between groups. RESULTS: From 273 patients included (190 females, 83 males), 125 (46%) were classified as tremulous and 148 (54%) as non-tremulous. Tremulous patients were more likely to have a segmental distribution (61% vs. 25%), often involving the arms (48%), and had more frequently associated arm tremor (55% vs. 10%). A positive family history of dystonia and/or tremor was more frequent in tremulous patients (50% vs. 18%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cervical dystonia with associated head tremor are more likely to have a segmental distribution (with frequent arm involvement), associated arm tremor and a positive family history, suggesting a genetic etiology in this subgroup of patients.
BACKGROUND: Primary cervical dystonia is the most common form of adult-onset focal dystonia. Although most frequently sporadic, 15-20% of patients report a positive family history, suggesting a possible genetic cause. Head tremor is often present in patients with cervical dystonia and may be a prominent symptom. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics of patients with tremulous cervical dystonia. METHODS: Patients with primary cervical dystonia attending our botulinum toxin clinic were assessed with an interview and neurological examination and their notes reviewed. Patients were classified as having either tremulous or non-tremulous cervical dystonia, according to the presence or absence of head tremor on examination. Clinical and demographic data were compared between groups. RESULTS: From 273 patients included (190 females, 83 males), 125 (46%) were classified as tremulous and 148 (54%) as non-tremulous. Tremulous patients were more likely to have a segmental distribution (61% vs. 25%), often involving the arms (48%), and had more frequently associated arm tremor (55% vs. 10%). A positive family history of dystonia and/or tremor was more frequent in tremulous patients (50% vs. 18%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cervical dystonia with associated head tremor are more likely to have a segmental distribution (with frequent arm involvement), associated arm tremor and a positive family history, suggesting a genetic etiology in this subgroup of patients.
Authors: Jianfeng Xiao; Ryan J Uitti; Yu Zhao; Satya R Vemula; Joel S Perlmutter; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Demetrius M Maraganore; Georg Auburger; Barbara Leube; Katja Lehnhoff; Mark S LeDoux Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: A Albanese; F Asmus; K P Bhatia; A E Elia; B Elibol; G Filippini; T Gasser; J K Krauss; N Nardocci; A Newton; J Valls-Solé Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: M Svetel; N Ivanović; J Marinković; J Jović; N Dragasević; V S Kostić Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Gavin Charlesworth; Vincent Plagnol; Kira M Holmström; Jose Bras; Una-Marie Sheerin; Elisavet Preza; Ignacio Rubio-Agusti; Mina Ryten; Susanne A Schneider; Maria Stamelou; Daniah Trabzuni; Andrey Y Abramov; Kailash P Bhatia; Nicholas W Wood Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Charalampos Tzoulis; Tetyana Zayats; Per Morten Knappskog; Bernd Müller; Jan Petter Larsen; Ole-Bjørn Tysnes; Laurence A Bindoff; Stefan Johansson; Kristoffer Haugarvoll Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Scott A Norris; H A Jinnah; Alberto J Espay; Christine Klein; Norbert Brüggemann; Richard L Barbano; Irene Andonia C Malaty; Ramon L Rodriguez; Marie Vidailhet; Emmanuel Roze; Stephen G Reich; Brian D Berman; Mark S LeDoux; Sarah Pirio Richardson; Pinky Agarwal; Zoltan Mari; William G Ondo; Ludy C Shih; Susan H Fox; Alfredo Berardelli; Claudia M Testa; Florence Ching-Fen Cheng; Daniel Truong; Fatta B Nahab; Tao Xie; Mark Hallett; Ami R Rosen; Laura J Wright; Joel S Perlmutter Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Takashi Tsuboi; Zakia Jabarkheel; Pamela R Zeilman; Matthew J Barabas; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun; Aparna Wagle Shukla Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-02-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: E Zoons; M A J Tijssen; Y E M Dreissen; J D Speelman; M Smit; J Booij Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Maria Stamelou; Gavin Charlesworth; Carla Cordivari; Susanne A Schneider; Georg Kägi; Una-Marie Sheerin; Ignacio Rubio-Agusti; Amit Batla; Henry Houlden; Nicholas W Wood; Kailash P Bhatia Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 10.338