Literature DB >> 23522806

Personalized prediction of first-cycle in vitro fertilization success.

Bokyung Choi1, Ernesto Bosch, Benjamin M Lannon, Marie-Claude Leveille, Wing H Wong, Arthur Leader, Antonio Pellicer, Alan S Penzias, Mylene W M Yao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test whether the probability of having a live birth (LB) with the first IVF cycle (C1) can be predicted and personalized for patients in diverse environments.
DESIGN: Retrospective validation of multicenter prediction model.
SETTING: Three university-affiliated outpatient IVF clinics located in different countries. PATIENT(S): Using primary models aggregated from >13,000 C1s, we applied the boosted tree method to train a preIVF-diversity model (PreIVF-D) with 1,061 C1s from 2008 to 2009, and validated predicted LB probabilities with an independent dataset comprising 1,058 C1s from 2008 to 2009. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Predictive power, reclassification, receiver operator characteristic analysis, calibration, dynamic range. RESULT(S): Overall, with PreIVF-D, 86% of cases had significantly different LB probabilities compared with age control, and more than one-half had higher LB probabilities. Specifically, 42% of patients could have been identified by PreIVF-D to have a personalized predicted success rate >45%, whereas an age-control model could not differentiate them from others. Furthermore, PreIVF-D showed improved predictive power, with 36% improved log-likelihood (or 9.0-fold by log-scale; >1,000-fold linear scale), and prediction errors for subgroups ranged from 0.9% to 3.7%. CONCLUSION(S): Validated prediction of personalized LB probabilities from diverse multiple sources identify excellent prognoses in more than one-half of patients.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23522806     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  15 in total

Review 1.  Are computational applications the "crystal ball" in the IVF laboratory? The evolution from mathematics to artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Evangelos Maziotis; Nikolaos Antoniou; Anna Rapani; George Anifandis; Panagiotis Bakas; Stamatis Bolaris; Agni Pantou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Male factor infertility: Prediction models for assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Vitaly A Kushnir; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  An artificial neural network for the prediction of assisted reproduction outcome.

Authors:  Paraskevi Vogiatzi; Abraham Pouliakis; Charalampos Siristatidis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Predicting the probability of a live birth after a freeze-all based in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) treatment strategy.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Zi-Li Sun; Miao-Xin Chen; Yang Yang; Xiao-Ming Teng; Yun Wang; Yuan-Yuan Wu
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2022-06

5.  Predictors of in vitro fertilization outcomes in women with highest follicle-stimulating hormone levels ≥ 12 IU/L: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lina N Huang; Sunny H Jun; Nathalie Drubach; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prognostic factors associated with clinical pregnancy in in vitro fertilization using pituitary down-regulation with depot and daily low-dose luteal phase gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists: A single center's experience.

Authors:  Caiyun Liao; Rui Huang; Roberta W Scherer; Xiao-Yan Liang
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

7.  Multivariate analysis of the factors associated with live births during in vitro fertilisation in Southeast Asia: a cross-sectional study of 104,015 in vitro fertilisation records in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hsi-Cheng Yu; Wen-May Rei; Shu-Ti Chiou; Chung-Yeh Deng
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.357

8.  Definition by FSH, AMH and embryo numbers of good-, intermediate- and poor-prognosis patients suggests previously unknown IVF outcome-determining factor associated with AMH.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Vitaly A Kushnir; Aritro Sen; Sarah K Darmon; Andrea Weghofer; Yan-Guang Wu; Qi Wang; Lin Zhang; David F Albertini; David H Barad
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 9.  Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice.

Authors:  Tamara Tobias; Fady I Sharara; Jason M Franasiak; Patrick W Heiser; Emily Pinckney-Clark
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2016-08-15

10.  Luteal phase ovarian stimulation for poor ovarian responders.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Meimei Wang; Shuang Wang; Hongchu Bao; Qinglan Qu; Ning Zhang; Cuifang Hao
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2018-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.