Literature DB >> 23522703

Bystander behavior in bullying situations: basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy.

Robert Thornberg1, Tomas Jungert.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate how basic moral sensitivity in bullying, moral disengagement in bullying and defender self-efficacy were related to different bystander behaviors in bullying. Therefore, we examined pathways that linked students' basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement, and defender self-efficacy to different bystander behaviors in bullying situations. Three hundred and forty-seven teenagers completed a bullying survey. Findings indicated that compared with boys, girls expressed higher basic moral sensitivity in bullying, lower defender self-efficacy and moral disengagement in bullying. Results from the SEM showed that basic moral sensitivity in bullying was negatively related to pro-bully behavior and positively related to outsider and defender behavior, mediated by moral disengagement in bullying, which in turn was positively related to pro-bully behavior and negatively related to outsider and defender behavior. What differed in the relations between outsider and defender behaviors was the degree of defender self-efficacy.
Copyright © 2013 The Foundation for Professionals in Services for Adolescents. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23522703     DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc        ISSN: 0140-1971


  20 in total

1.  Defend, Stand By, or Join In?: The Relative Influence of Moral Identity, Moral Judgment, and Social Self-Efficacy on Adolescents' Bystander Behaviors in Bullying Situations.

Authors:  Renee B Patrick; Wendy M Rote; John C Gibbs; Karen S Basinger
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2019-08-23

2.  Longitudinal Relationships between Bullying and Moral Disengagement among Adolescents.

Authors:  Cixin Wang; Ji Hoon Ryoo; Susan M Swearer; Rhonda Turner; Taryn S Goldberg
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-10-04

3.  Pow! Boom! Kablam! Effects of Viewing Superhero Programs on Aggressive, Prosocial, and Defending Behaviors in Preschool Children.

Authors:  Sarah M Coyne; Laura Stockdale; Jennifer Ruh Linder; David A Nelson; Kevin M Collier; Lee W Essig
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2017-11

4.  Moral Identity and Adolescent Prosocial and Antisocial Behaviors: Interactions with Moral Disengagement and Self-regulation.

Authors:  Sam A Hardy; Dallas S Bean; Joseph A Olsen
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2014-08-22

5.  The role of individual and collective moral disengagement in peer aggression and bystanding: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Gianluca Gini; Tiziana Pozzoli; Kay Bussey
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2015-04

6.  Scaling and Disseminating Brief Bullying Prevention Programming: Strengths, Challenges, & Considerations.

Authors:  Stephen S Leff; Tracy Evian Waasdorp; Brooke S Paskewich; Flaura K Winston
Journal:  School Psych Rev       Date:  2021-02-02

7.  Predicting the development of pro-bullying bystander behavior: A short-term longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Wendy Troop-Gordon; Cynthia A Frosch; Christine M Wienke Totura; Alyssa N Bailey; Jennifer D Jackson; Robert D Dvorak
Journal:  J Sch Psychol       Date:  2019-11-25

8.  Individual and Classroom Social-Cognitive Processes in Bullying: A Short-Term Longitudinal Multilevel Study.

Authors:  Robert Thornberg; Linda Wänström; Shelley Hymel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-07-31

9.  Bystanders' behaviours and associated factors in cyberbullying.

Authors:  Jidapa Panumaporn; Sirichai Hongsanguansri; Wanlop Atsariyasing; Komsan Kiatrungrit
Journal:  Gen Psychiatr       Date:  2020-05-17

10.  Students' Willingness to Intervene in Bullying: Direct and Indirect Associations with Classroom Cohesion and Self-Efficacy.

Authors:  Sebastian Wachs; Ludwig Bilz; Saskia M Fischer; Wilfried Schubarth; Michelle F Wright
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.