OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to use high-pressure high-temperature (HP/HT) polymerization to produce urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA)-triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) based resin composite blocks (RCB) suitable for dental computer-aided design/manufacture (CAD/CAM) applications and to compare their physical/mechanical properties to those of a commercial dental RCB. The null hypotheses tested were: (1) there are no differences in the physical/mechanical properties between HP/HT polymerized UDMA-TEGDMA RCB and a commercial RCB; (2) volume fraction filler (Vf) does not affect the physical/mechanical properties of HP/HT polymerized RCB. METHODS: Four UDMA-based experimental RCB were manufactured under HP/HT conditions. A RCB manufactured under the same HP/HT conditions from a commercial resin composite (Z100) and its commercial counterpart CAD/CAM RCB (Paradigm MZ100) were used as controls. Flexural strength (σf), fracture toughness (KIC), and hardness were determined. The results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Scheffé multiple means comparisons (α=0.05), and Weibull statistics (for σf). Scanning electron microscopy was used to characterize fractured surfaces. RESULTS: All HP/HT polymerized RCB had superior σf, KIC, and Weibull modulus compared to the commercial dental RCB. The experimental RCB had similar or superior properties compared to HP/HT polymerized Z100 RCB. Fewer and smaller porosities (not quantified) were apparent in HP/HT polymerized RCB. The experimental RCB that contained 65% Vf showed higher porosity, suggesting practical difficulties in filler incorporation beyond a certain Vf. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggested that RCB suitable for dental CAD/CAM applications could be obtained by HP/HT polymerization of resin composites based on pure UDMA.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to use high-pressure high-temperature (HP/HT) polymerization to produce urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA)-triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) based resin composite blocks (RCB) suitable for dental computer-aided design/manufacture (CAD/CAM) applications and to compare their physical/mechanical properties to those of a commercial dental RCB. The null hypotheses tested were: (1) there are no differences in the physical/mechanical properties between HP/HT polymerized UDMA-TEGDMARCB and a commercial RCB; (2) volume fraction filler (Vf) does not affect the physical/mechanical properties of HP/HT polymerized RCB. METHODS: Four UDMA-based experimental RCB were manufactured under HP/HT conditions. A RCB manufactured under the same HP/HT conditions from a commercial resin composite (Z100) and its commercial counterpart CAD/CAMRCB (Paradigm MZ100) were used as controls. Flexural strength (σf), fracture toughness (KIC), and hardness were determined. The results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Scheffé multiple means comparisons (α=0.05), and Weibull statistics (for σf). Scanning electron microscopy was used to characterize fractured surfaces. RESULTS: All HP/HT polymerized RCB had superior σf, KIC, and Weibull modulus compared to the commercial dental RCB. The experimental RCB had similar or superior properties compared to HP/HT polymerized Z100 RCB. Fewer and smaller porosities (not quantified) were apparent in HP/HT polymerized RCB. The experimental RCB that contained 65% Vf showed higher porosity, suggesting practical difficulties in filler incorporation beyond a certain Vf. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggested that RCB suitable for dental CAD/CAM applications could be obtained by HP/HT polymerization of resin composites based on pure UDMA.
Authors: Rasha A Alamoush; Nick Silikas; Nesreen A Salim; Suhad Al-Nasrawi; Julian D Satterthwaite Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Mathilde Tassin; Eric Bonte; Ludwig S Loison-Robert; Ali Nassif; Tsouria Berbar; Stéphane Le Goff; Ariane Berdal; Michael Sadoun; Benjamin P J Fournier Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 3.240