Literature DB >> 23522611

Determining risk for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by location type in a Canadian urban setting to guide future public access defibrillator placement.

Steven C Brooks1, Jonathan H Hsu, Sabrina K Tang, Roshan Jeyakumar, Timothy C Y Chan.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Automated external defibrillator use by lay bystanders during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rarely occurs but can improve survival. We seek to estimate risk for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by location type and evaluate current automated external defibrillator deployment in a Canadian urban setting to guide future automated external defibrillator deployment.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a population-based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest database. We included consecutive public location, nontraumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurring in Toronto from January 1, 2006, to June 30, 2010, captured in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry database. Two investigators independently categorized each out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and automated external defibrillator location into one of 38 categories. Total site counts in each location category were used to estimate average annual per-site cardiac arrest incidence and determine the relative automated external defibrillator coverage for each location type.
RESULTS: There were 608 eligible out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases. The top 5 location categories by average annual out-of-hospital cardiac arrests per site were race track/casino (0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0 to 1.63), jail (0.62; 95% CI 0.3 to 1.06), hotel/motel (0.15; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.18), hostel/shelter (0.14; 95% CI 0.067 to 0.19), and convention center (0.11; 95% CI 0 to 0.43). Although schools were relatively lower risk for cardiac arrest, they represented 72.5% of automated external defibrillator-covered locations in the study region. Some higher-risk location types such as hotel/motel, hostel/shelter, and rail station were severely underrepresented with respect to automated external defibrillator coverage.
CONCLUSION: We have identified types of locations with higher per-site risk for cardiac arrest relative to others. We have also identified potential mismatches between cardiac arrest risk by location type and registered automated external defibrillator distribution in a Canadian urban setting.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23522611     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.10.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  10 in total

1.  Increased cardiac arrest survival and bystander intervention in enclosed pedestrian walkway systems.

Authors:  Minha Lee; Derya Demirtas; Jason E Buick; Michael J Feldman; Sheldon Cheskes; Laurie J Morrison; Timothy C Y Chan
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Use of automated external defibrillators in US federal buildings: implementation of the Federal Occupational Health public access defibrillation program.

Authors:  Austin S Kilaru; Marc Leffer; John Perkner; Kate Flanigan Sawyer; Chandra E Jolley; Lindsay D Nadkarni; Frances S Shofer; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.162

3.  Characteristics of automated external defibrillator coverage in Philadelphia, PA, based on land use and estimated risk.

Authors:  Benjamin W Chrisinger; Anne V Grossestreuer; Meredith C Laguna; Heather M Griffis; Charles C Branas; Douglas J Wiebe; Raina M Merchant
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Overcoming Spatial and Temporal Barriers to Public Access Defibrillators Via Optimization.

Authors:  Christopher L F Sun; Derya Demirtas; Steven C Brooks; Laurie J Morrison; Timothy C Y Chan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Ranking Businesses and Municipal Locations by Spatiotemporal Cardiac Arrest Risk to Guide Public Defibrillator Placement.

Authors:  Christopher L F Sun; Steven C Brooks; Laurie J Morrison; Timothy C Y Chan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by public location in the public-access defibrillation era.

Authors:  Yukiko Murakami; Taku Iwami; Tetsuhisa Kitamura; Chika Nishiyama; Tatsuya Nishiuchi; Yasuyuki Hayashi; Takashi Kawamura
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Are there disparities in the location of automated external defibrillators in England?

Authors:  Terry P Brown; Gavin D Perkins; Christopher M Smith; Charles D Deakin; Rachael Fothergill
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  Distribution and use of automated external defibrillators and their effect on return of spontaneous circulation in Danish hospitals.

Authors:  Mathilde Stærk; Kasper G Lauridsen; Kristian Krogh; Bo Løfgren
Journal:  Resusc Plus       Date:  2022-02-08

Review 9.  Effective deployment of public-access automated external defibrillators to improve out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes.

Authors:  Shinji Nakahara; Tetsuya Sakamoto
Journal:  J Gen Fam Med       Date:  2017-05-08

10.  An analysis of the relationship between the applied medical rescue actions and the return of spontaneous circulation in adults with out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Klaudiusz Nadolny; Lukasz Szarpak; Joanna Gotlib; Mariusz Panczyk; Maciej Sterlinski; Jerzy Robert Ladny; Jacek Smereka; Robert Galazkowski
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.