Literature DB >> 23522013

Cardiac power output and its response to exercise in athletes and non-athletes.

Aleksandar V Klasnja1, Djordje G Jakovljevic, Otto F Barak, Jelena Z Popadic Gacesa, Damir D Lukac, Nikola G Grujic.   

Abstract

Cardiac power output (CPO) is an integrative measure of overall cardiac function as it accounts for both, flow- and pressure-generating capacities of the heart. The purpose of the present study was twofold: (i) to assess cardiac power output and its response to exercise in athletes and non-athletes and (ii) to determine the relationship between cardiac power output and reserve and selected measures of cardiac function and structure. Twenty male athletes and 32 age- and gender-matched healthy sedentary controls participated in this study. CPO was calculated as the product of cardiac output and mean arterial pressure, expressed in watts. Measures of hemodynamic status, cardiac structure and pumping capability were assessed by echocardiography. CPO was assessed at rest and after peak bicycle exercise. At rest, the two groups had similar values of cardiac power output (1·08 ± 0·2 W versus 1·1 ± 0·24 W, P>0·05), but the athletes demonstrated lower systolic blood pressure (109·5 ± 6·2 mmHg versus 117·2 ± 8·2 mmHg, P<0·05) and thicker posterior wall of the left ventricle (9·8 ± 1 mm versus 9 ± 1·1 mm, P<0·05). Peak CPO was higher in athletes (5·87 ± 0·75 W versus 5·4 ± 0·69 W, P<0·05) as was cardiac reserve (4·92 ± 0·66 W versus 4·26 ± 0·61 W, P<0·05), respectively. Peak exercise CPO and reserve were only moderately correlated with end-diastolic volume (r = 0·54; r = 0·46, P<0·05) and end-diastolic left ventricular internal diameter (r = 0·48; r = 0·42, P<0·05), respectively. Athletes demonstrated greater maximal cardiac pumping capability and reserve than non-athletes. The study provides new evidence that resting measures of cardiac structure and function need to be considered with caution in interpretation of maximal cardiac performance.
© 2012 The Authors Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging © 2012 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23522013     DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging        ISSN: 1475-0961            Impact factor:   2.273


  4 in total

1.  Test-Retest Reliability of Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement during Exercise in Healthy Volunteers in Daily Clinical Routine.

Authors:  Michael Thomas Coll Barroso; Matthias Wilhelm Hoppe; Philip Boehme; Thomas Krahn; Christian Kiefer; Frank Kramer; Thomas Mondritzki; Phillipe Pirez; Wilfried Dinh
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Physiological Effects of Training in Elite German Winter Sport Athletes: Sport Specific Remodeling Determined Using Echocardiographic Data and CPET Performance Parameters.

Authors:  Paul Zimmermann; Isabelle Schöffl; Volker Schöffl; Lukas Zimmermann; Max L Eckstein; Othmar Moser; Jan Wüstenfeld
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-07-25

3.  Post cardiac surgery stunning reduces stroke work, but leaves cardiac power output unchanged in patients with normal ejection fraction.

Authors:  Tomas D Tannvik; Audun E Rimehaug; Nils K Skjaervold; Idar Kirkeby-Garstad
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-07

4.  Athlete's Heart in Elite Biathlon, Nordic Cross-Country and Ski-Mountaineering Athletes: Cardiac Adaptions Determined Using Echocardiographic Data.

Authors:  Paul Zimmermann; Othmar Moser; Max L Eckstein; Jan Wüstenfeld; Volker Schöffl; Lukas Zimmermann; Martin Braun; Isabelle Schöffl
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2021-12-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.