Literature DB >> 23521963

Surgical management of complicated diverticulitis: a comparison of the laparoscopic and open approaches.

Tafari Mbadiwe1, Augustine C Obirieze, Edward E Cornwell, Patricia Turner, Terrence M Fullum.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy has become a commonly used method of performing colectomies, but the outcomes associated with laparoscopy in the emergency setting have not been well studied. STUDY
DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for patients with diverticulitis without hemorrhage who underwent a colectomy. Patient data retrieved included demographics and preoperative comorbidities. Each member of the cohort received either a primary anastomosis (PA) or a colostomy. Open and laparoscopic procedures were compared within these subgroups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to compare the risk-adjusted odds of postoperative morbidity and mortality for laparoscopic and open procedures. The risk-adjusted impact of preoperative comorbidities was also assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 11,981 patients in the database met the study criteria. The majority were female (53%) and Caucasian (82%), and the mean age was 58 (±13) years. Comorbidities of the cardiovascular, pulmonary, or renal systems were present in 47%, 5%, and 1% of the cohort, respectively. On bivariate analysis, patients undergoing laparoscopy experienced lower rates of complications with both PA (14% vs 26%, p < 0.001) and colostomy (30% vs 37%, p = 0.02). The laparoscopic approach was associated with decreased mortality rates for patients undergoing PA (0.24% vs 0.79%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative cardiovascular and pulmonary comorbidities were each associated with increased postoperative morbidity, and that the laparoscopic approach was associated with lower postoperative morbidity for patients undergoing PA. The reduced risk of death for patients undergoing laparoscopic PA (vs open approach) did not achieve statistical significance (odds ratio 0.68, p = 0.3). A small number of patients underwent laparoscopic colostomy (n = 237, 2.4%), and they did not have a significantly different risk of death.
CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic approach is associated with lower complication rates compared with the open approach for the surgical treatment of diverticulitis with a primary anastomosis.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23521963     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  12 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Surgery for Complicated Diverticulitis.

Authors:  Valerio Celentano; M C Giglio
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Surgeon Volume Correlates with Reduced Mortality and Improved Quality in the Surgical Management of Diverticulitis.

Authors:  Rachelle N Damle; Julie M Flahive; Jennifer S Davids; W Brian Sweeney; Paul R Sturrock; Justin A Maykel; Karim Alavi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus open resection for sigmoid diverticulitis.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Gian A Binda; Alessandro Montedori; Alberto Arezzo; Roberto Cirocchi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-25

4.  Single-port laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: experiences with more than 300 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Boris Vestweber; Karl-Heinz Vestweber; Claudia Paul; Andreas D Rink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic sigmoid resection without diversion in perforated diverticulitis.

Authors:  Nicolás H Dreifuss; Francisco Schlottmann; Jose M Piatti; Maximiliano E Bun; Nicolás A Rotholtz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review.

Authors:  Gabriela Batista Rodríguez; Andrea Balla; Santiago Corradetti; Carmen Martinez; Pilar Hernández; Jesús Bollo; Eduard M Targarona
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Laparoscopic treatment of complicated colonic diverticular disease: A review.

Authors:  Ronald Daher; Elie Barouki; Elie Chouillard
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-27

8.  Systematic review of emergent laparoscopic colorectal surgery for benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  Manish Chand; Muhammed R S Siddiqui; Ashish Gupta; Shahnawaz Rasheed; Paris Tekkis; Amjad Parvaiz; Alex H Mirnezami; Tahseen Qureshi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Laparoscopic management of intra-abdominal infections: Systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Federico Coccolini; Cristian Tranà; Massimo Sartelli; Fausto Catena; Salomone Di Saverio; Roberto Manfredi; Giulia Montori; Marco Ceresoli; Chiara Falcone; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-27

Review 10.  Role of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of diverticular disease: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  Massimiliano Bissolati; Elena Orsenigo; Carlo Staudacher
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.