OBJECTIVES: The aim of this research was to investigate whether a training intervention to enhance collaboration between mental health and primary care professionals improved the detection and management of mental health problems in primary health care in four large cities in Brazil. The training intervention was a multifaceted program over 96 h focused on development of a shared care model. METHOD: A quasiexperimental study design was undertaken with assessment of performance by nurse and general practitioners (GPs) pre- and postintervention. Rates of recognition of mental health disorders (compared with the General Health Questionnaire) were the primary outcome, while self-reports of patient-centered care, psychosocial interventions and referral were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Six to 8 months postintervention, no changes were observed in terms of rate of recognition across the entire sample. Nurses significantly increased their recognition rates (from 23% to 39%, P=.05), while GPs demonstrated a significant decrease (from 42% to 30%, P=.04). There were significant increases in reports of patient-centered care, but no changes in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Training professionals in a shared care model was not associated with consistent improvements in the recognition or management of mental health problems. Although instabilities in the local context may have contributed to the lack of effects, wider changes in the system of care may be required to augment training and encourage reliable changes in behavior, and more specific educating models are necessary.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this research was to investigate whether a training intervention to enhance collaboration between mental health and primary care professionals improved the detection and management of mental health problems in primary health care in four large cities in Brazil. The training intervention was a multifaceted program over 96 h focused on development of a shared care model. METHOD: A quasiexperimental study design was undertaken with assessment of performance by nurse and general practitioners (GPs) pre- and postintervention. Rates of recognition of mental health disorders (compared with the General Health Questionnaire) were the primary outcome, while self-reports of patient-centered care, psychosocial interventions and referral were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Six to 8 months postintervention, no changes were observed in terms of rate of recognition across the entire sample. Nurses significantly increased their recognition rates (from 23% to 39%, P=.05), while GPs demonstrated a significant decrease (from 42% to 30%, P=.04). There were significant increases in reports of patient-centered care, but no changes in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Training professionals in a shared care model was not associated with consistent improvements in the recognition or management of mental health problems. Although instabilities in the local context may have contributed to the lack of effects, wider changes in the system of care may be required to augment training and encourage reliable changes in behavior, and more specific educating models are necessary.
Authors: Sonia Maria Martins; William Salibe-Filho; Luís Paulo Tonioli; Luís Eduardo Pfingesten; Patrícia Dias Braz; Juliet McDonnell; Siân Williams; Débora do Carmo; Jaime Correia de Sousa; Hilary Pinnock; Rafael Stelmach Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 2.871
Authors: Karen Athié; Alice Lopes do Amaral Menezes; Angela Machado da Silva; Monica Campos; Pedro Gabriel Delgado; Sandra Fortes; Christopher Dowrick Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Angela R Ghesquiere; Rogerio M Pinto; Rahbel Rahman; Anya Y Spector Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 3.390