Literature DB >> 23521668

Assessing the risk of ships striking large whales in marine spatial planning.

J V Redfern1, M F McKenna, T J Moore, J Calambokidis, M L Deangelis, E A Becker, J Barlow, K A Forney, P C Fiedler, S J Chivers.   

Abstract

Marine spatial planning provides a comprehensive framework for managing multiple uses of the marine environment and has the potential to minimize environmental impacts and reduce conflicts among users. Spatially explicit assessments of the risks to key marine species from human activities are a requirement of marine spatial planning. We assessed the risk of ships striking humpback (Megaptera novaeangliae), blue (Balaenoptera musculus), and fin (Balaenoptera physalus) whales in alternative shipping routes derived from patterns of shipping traffic off Southern California (U.S.A.). Specifically, we developed whale-habitat models and assumed ship-strike risk for the alternative shipping routes was proportional to the number of whales predicted by the models to occur within each route. This definition of risk assumes all ships travel within a single route. We also calculated risk assuming ships travel via multiple routes. We estimated the potential for conflict between shipping and other uses (military training and fishing) due to overlap with the routes. We also estimated the overlap between shipping routes and protected areas. The route with the lowest risk for humpback whales had the highest risk for fin whales and vice versa. Risk to both species may be ameliorated by creating a new route south of the northern Channel Islands and spreading traffic between this new route and the existing route in the Santa Barbara Channel. Creating a longer route may reduce the overlap between shipping and other uses by concentrating shipping traffic. Blue whales are distributed more evenly across our study area than humpback and fin whales; thus, risk could not be ameliorated by concentrating shipping traffic in any of the routes we considered. Reducing ship-strike risk for blue whales may be necessary because our estimate of the potential number of strikes suggests that they are likely to exceed allowable levels of anthropogenic impacts established under U.S. laws. Conservation Biology
© 2013 Society for Conservation Biology No claim to original US government works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23521668     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  15 in total

1.  Vulnerability of Arctic marine mammals to vessel traffic in the increasingly ice-free Northwest Passage and Northern Sea Route.

Authors:  Donna D W Hauser; Kristin L Laidre; Harry L Stern
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A spatially explicit risk assessment approach: Cetaceans and marine traffic in the Pelagos Sanctuary (Mediterranean Sea).

Authors:  Maria Grazia Pennino; Antonella Arcangeli; Vinícius Prado Fonseca; Ilaria Campana; Graham J Pierce; Andrea Rotta; Jose Maria Bellido
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  High mortality of blue, humpback and fin whales from modeling of vessel collisions on the U.S. West Coast suggests population impacts and insufficient protection.

Authors:  R Cotton Rockwood; John Calambokidis; Jaime Jahncke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Shipping routes through core habitat of endangered sperm whales along the Hellenic Trench, Greece: Can we reduce collision risks?

Authors:  Alexandros Frantzis; Russell Leaper; Paraskevi Alexiadou; Aristides Prospathopoulos; Dimitrios Lekkas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Wintering habitat model for the North Atlantic Right Whale (Eubalaena glacialis) in the southeastern United States.

Authors:  Timothy A Gowan; Joel G Ortega-Ortiz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Compliance with vessel speed restrictions to protect North Atlantic right whales.

Authors:  Gregory K Silber; Jeffrey D Adams; Christopher J Fonnesbeck
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  The crowded sea: incorporating multiple marine activities in conservation plans can significantly alter spatial priorities.

Authors:  Tessa Mazor; Hugh P Possingham; Dori Edelist; Eran Brokovich; Salit Kark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Spatial and temporal occurrence of blue whales off the U.S. West Coast, with implications for management.

Authors:  Ladd M Irvine; Bruce R Mate; Martha H Winsor; Daniel M Palacios; Steven J Bograd; Daniel P Costa; Helen Bailey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Krill Hotspot Formation and Phenology in the California Current Ecosystem.

Authors:  Jerome Fiechter; Jarrod A Santora; Francisco Chavez; Devon Northcott; Monique Messié
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 5.576

10.  Context-dependent variability in blue whale acoustic behaviour.

Authors:  Leah A Lewis; John Calambokidis; Alison K Stimpert; James Fahlbusch; Ari S Friedlaender; Megan F McKenna; Sarah L Mesnick; Erin M Oleson; Brandon L Southall; Angela R Szesciorka; Ana Širović
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.