Literature DB >> 23521618

The distribution of pace adopted by cyclists during a cross-country mountain bike World Championships.

Chris R Abbiss1, Megan L R Ross, Laura A Garvican, Neil Ross, Torben Pottgiesser, John Gregory, David T Martin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the distribution of pace self-selected by cyclists of varying ability, biological age and sex performing in a mountain bike World Championship event. Data were collected on cyclists performing in the Elite Male (ELITEmale; n = 75), Elite Female (ELITEfemale; n = 50), Under 23 Male (U23male; n = 62), Under 23 Female (U23female; n = 34), Junior Male (JNRmale; n = 71) and Junior Female (JNRfemale; n = 30) categories of the 2009 UCI Cross-Country Mountain Bike World Championships. Split times were recorded for the top, middle and bottom 20% of all finishers of each category. Timing splits were positioned to separate the course into technical and non-technical, uphill, downhill and rolling/flat sections. Compared with bottom performers, top performers in all male categories (ELITEmale, U23male, JNRmale) maintained a more even pace over the event as evidenced by a significantly lower standard deviation and range in average lap speed. Top performers, males, and ELITEmale athletes spent a lower percentage of overall race time on technical uphill sections of the course, compared with middle and bottom placed finishers, females, and JNRmale athletes, respectively. Better male performers adopt a more even distribution of pace throughout cross-country mountain events. Performance of lower placed finishers, females and JNRmale athletes may be improved by enhancing technical uphill cycling ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23521618     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2012.751118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  6 in total

1.  The effect of an even-pacing strategy on exercise tolerance in well-trained cyclists.

Authors:  Kevin Thomas; Mark Stone; Alan St Clair Gibson; Kevin Thompson; Les Ansley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A descriptive and comparative analysis of injuries reported in USA Cycling-sanctioned competitive road cycling events.

Authors:  Gregory Jancaitis; Alison R Snyder Valier; Curt Bay
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2022-07-14

Review 3.  Factors influencing pacing in triathlon.

Authors:  Sam Sx Wu; Jeremiah J Peiffer; Jeanick Brisswalter; Kazunori Nosaka; Chris R Abbiss
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2014-09-16

Review 4.  Current Perspectives of Cross-Country Mountain Biking: Physiological and Mechanical Aspects, Evolution of Bikes, Accidents and Injuries.

Authors:  Rhaí André Arriel; Hiago L R Souza; Jeffer Eidi Sasaki; Moacir Marocolo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Effect of Different Feedback Modalities on Swimming Pace: Which Feedback Modality is Most Effective?

Authors:  Cesare Altavilla; Roberto Cejuela; Pablo Caballero-Pérez
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Exercise Intensity and Pacing Pattern During a Cross-Country Olympic Mountain Bike Race.

Authors:  Steffan Næss; Ove Sollie; Øyvind Nøstdahl Gløersen; Thomas Losnegard
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.