Literature DB >> 23521434

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.

Don Husereau, Michael Drummond, Stavros Petrou, Chris Carswell, David Moher, Dan Greenberg, Federico Augustovski, Andrew H Briggs, Josephine Mauskopf, Elizabeth Loder.   

Abstract

Economic evaluations of health interventions pose a particular challenge for reporting. There is also a need to consolidate and update existing guidelines and promote their use in a user-friendly manner. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines efforts into one current, useful reporting guidance. The primary audiences for the CHEERS statement are researchers reporting economic evaluations and the editors and peer reviewers assessing them for publication. The need for new reporting guidance was identified by a survey of medical editors. A list of possible items based on a systematic review was created. A two round, modified Delphi panel consisting of representatives from academia, clinical practice, industry, government, and the editorial community was conducted. Out of 44 candidate items, 24 items and accompanying recommendations were developed. The recommendations are contained in a user-friendly, 24-item checklist. A copy of the statement, accompanying checklist, and this report can be found on the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluations Publication Guidelines Task Force website (www.ispor.org/TaskForces/EconomicPubGuidelines.asp). The hope is that CHEERS will lead to better reporting and, ultimately, better health decisions. To facilitate dissemination and uptake, the CHEERS statement is being co-published across 10 health economics and medical journals. Other journals and groups are encouraged to endorse CHEERS. The author team plans to review the checklist for an update in 5 years.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23521434     DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2013.784591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  8 in total

Review 1.  Targeting Health Behaviors to Reduce Health Care Costs in Pediatric Psychology: Descriptive Review and Recommendations.

Authors:  Meghan E McGrady; Kevin A Hommel
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2015-09-10

2.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Surgical Fixation of Distal Radial Fractures: A Computer Model-Based Evaluation of Three Operative Modalities.

Authors:  Prashant V Rajan; Rameez A Qudsi; George S M Dyer; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Costing methodologies in European economic evaluation guidelines: commonalities and divergences.

Authors:  Leticia García-Mochón; Zuzana Špacírová; Jaime Espín
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-11-26

4.  Estimating implementation and operational costs of an integrated tiered CD4 service including laboratory and point of care testing in a remote health district in South Africa.

Authors:  Naseem Cassim; Lindi M Coetzee; Kathryn Schnippel; Deborah K Glencross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Establishing a cost-per-result of laboratory-based, reflex Cryptococcal antigenaemia screening (CrAg) in HIV+ patients with CD4 counts less than 100 cells/μl using a Lateral Flow Assay (LFA) at a typical busy CD4 laboratory in South Africa.

Authors:  Naseem Cassim; Kathryn Schnippel; Lindi Marie Coetzee; Deborah Kim Glencross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reported use of reporting guidelines among JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute authors, editorial outcomes, and reviewer ratings related to adherence to guidelines and clarity of presentation.

Authors:  Jeannine Botos
Journal:  Res Integr Peer Rev       Date:  2018-09-27

7.  Using decision analysis to support implementation planning in research and practice.

Authors:  Natalie Riva Smith; Kathleen E Knocke; Kristen Hassmiller Lich
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-07-30

8.  Simulation models of sugary drink policies: A scoping review.

Authors:  Natalie Riva Smith; Anna H Grummon; Shu Wen Ng; Sarah Towner Wright; Leah Frerichs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.