Literature DB >> 23521032

Pediatric photoscreeners in high risk patients 2012: a comparison study of Plusoptix, Iscreen and SPOT.

Robert W Arnold, Andrew W Arnold, M Diane Armitage, Janet M Shen, Tom E Hepler, Thad L Woodard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New photoscreening models promise to detect amblyopia risk factors early in hopes of reducing permanent pediatric monocular and binocular vision impairment. The 3 commercially available interpreted photoscreeners had not yet been compared.
METHODS: This is a prospective, observational screening study following AAPOS guidelines on pediatric patients with and without developmental delays. 270 patients in a pediatric eye practice aged 4.7 +/- 4 years with 7% special needs. From December 2011 through March 2012, the Plusoptix, the iScreen, and the Pediavision SPOT were applied before confirmatory exam in a clinical pediatric eye practice.
RESULTS: The inconclusive rate ranged from 1-4% (iScreen) to 12% (Plusoptix). Sensitivity ranged from 72% (iScreen) to 84% (Plusoptix) and specificity ranged from 68% (SPOT) to 94% (Plusoptix). The iScreen can provide results in 99% of high risk patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort with high pre-screening prevalence, the 2011 photoscreeners had favorable validation that is expected to improve with further clinical study. Pediatricians have practical technology with a recognized procedure code to assist in amblyopia reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23521032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano        ISSN: 2160-5351


  9 in total

1.  Early Childhood Vision Screening in Hawai'i Utilizing a Hand-Held Screener.

Authors:  Duane A Chang; Roger C Ede; Dominic C Chow; Ryan D Souza; Louie Mar A Gangcuangco; Nancy Hanks; Beau K Nakamoto; Brooks Mitchell; Alison T Masutani; Sam Fisk; Cecilia M Shikuma; Jan E Dill
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2015-09

2.  The effectiveness of the Spot Vision Screener in detecting amblyopia risk factors.

Authors:  Mae Millicent W Peterseim; Carrie E Papa; M Edward Wilson; Jennifer D Davidson; Maria Shtessel; Mavesh Husain; Edward W Cheeseman; Bethany J Wolf; Rupal Trivedi
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.220

3.  Photoscreeners in the pediatric eye office: compared testability and refractions on high-risk children.

Authors:  Mae Millicent W Peterseim; Carrie E Papa; M Edward Wilson; Edward W Cheeseman; Bethany J Wolf; Jennifer D Davidson; Rupal H Trivedi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 4.  Tests for detecting strabismus in children aged 1 to 6 years in the community.

Authors:  Sarah Hull; Vijay Tailor; Sara Balduzzi; Jugnoo Rahi; Christine Schmucker; Gianni Virgili; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-06

5.  Drive-by Photoscreening: Plusoptix, 2WIN and Blinq Amblyopia Detection During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Mason Keffalos; Samuel Martin; Robert Arnold
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-23

Review 6.  Scope and costs of autorefraction and photoscreening for childhood amblyopia-a systematic narrative review in relation to the EUSCREEN project data.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Helen J Griffiths; Jill Carlton; Paolo Mazzone; Arinder Channa; Mandy Nordmann; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Instrument Referral Criteria for PlusoptiX, SPOT and 2WIN Targeting 2021 AAPOS Guidelines.

Authors:  Robert Arnold; David Silbert; Heather Modjesky
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-25

8.  Comparative Validation of PlusoptiX and AI-Optic Photoscreeners in Children with High Amblyopia Risk Factor Prevalence.

Authors:  Robert W Arnold
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-08-16

9.  Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases.

Authors:  Samuel Joseph Martin; Hser Eh Htoo; Nay Hser; Robert W Arnold
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.