| Literature DB >> 23520445 |
Masaya Saito1, Yasushi Seo, Yoshihiko Yano, Kenji Momose, Hirotaka Hirano, Masaru Yoshida, Takeshi Azuma.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that can occasionally lead to the shortening of life expectancy. We aimed to make a new and more accurate prognostic model taking into account the course of disease after TACE. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23520445 PMCID: PMC3592854 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055441
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The background clinical characteristics of the one-year mortality group and the survival group after TACE (n = 100).
| Factor | One-year mortality group | One-year survival group | p value |
| n = 22 | n = 78 | ||
| Age (years) | 74 (56–86) | 71 (41–87) | 0.436† |
| Sex (male/female) | 12/10 | 49/29 | 0.621¶ |
| Height (cm) | 156.1±8.2 (144.0–170.7) | 160.7±9.6 (138.0–179.0) | 0.023* |
| Body weight (kg) | 59.5±7.9 (47.8–74.7) | 59.3±10.8 (37.0–93.6) | 0.468* |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.4±2.6 (19.0–28.8) | 22.8±2.9 (15.6–30.2) | 0.012* |
| HBs Ag (+/−) | 3/19 | 9/69 | 0.723¶ |
| HCV Ab (+/−) | 17/5 | 54/24 | 0.598¶ |
| Alcohol (over 20 g/day)(+/−) | 4/18 | 24/54 | 0.293¶ |
| Child's score (5, 6, 7, 8, 9) | 3/7/5/4/3 | 35/13/12/11/7 | 0.038† |
| MELD score | 7.4 (6.0–11.9) | 7.1 (6.0–20.7) | 0.403† |
| TNM Stage of HCC (I, II, III, IVa, IVb) | 0/5/13/4/0 | 9/32/36/1/0 | 0.0004* |
| BCLC Stage of HCC (0, A, B, C, D) | 0/0/19/3/0 | 9/34/34/1/0 | 0.0000* |
| CLIP score (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) | 1/2/7/8/4/0/0 | 21/24/28/5/0/0/0 | 0.0000* |
| JIS score (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) | 0/1/10/10/1/0 | 7/19/38/14/0/0 | 0.0001* |
| Modified-JIS score (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) | 0/1/10/8/3/0 | 7/18/37/15/1/0 | 0.0002* |
| Okuda score (I, II, III) | 3/19/0 | 44/34/0 | 0.001¶ |
| Past treatment frequency of TACE (times) | 3 (0–11) | 1 (0–10) | 0.0005† |
| Past treatments other than TACE (+/−) | 12/10 | 26/52 | 0.085¶ |
| Total oral intake (kcal/IBW/day) | 32.3±4.4 (27.0–43.8) | 30.9±4.5 (18.9–42.7) | 0.080* |
| npRQ | 0.88 (0.74–1.16) | 0.87 (0.71–1.31) | 0.112† |
| REE (kcal) | 1284±177 (930–1560) | 1348±229 (840–2030) | 0.115* |
| Plt (×104/µl) | 9.3 (4.0–23.7) | 10.2 (1.1–23.1) | 0.163† |
| Lymphocytes (/µl) | 1094 (519–1879) | 1094 (299–3143) | 0.868† |
| PT (%) | 77.1 (67.2–99.5) | 84.2 (57.6–100.0) | 0.188† |
| AST (IU/l) | 46 (19–127) | 50 (18–162) | 0.188† |
| ALT (IU/l) | 35 (11–89) | 38 (13–131) | 0.148† |
| γ-GTP (IU/l) | 41 (10–310) | 50 (13–1188) | 0.209† |
| T-Bil (mg/dl) | 0.7 (0.4–2.5) | 0.9 (0.3–2.4) | 0.162† |
| ChE (IU/l) | 149±65 (81–348) | 174±71 (47–327) | 0.071* |
| Alb (g/dl) | 3.2 (2.4–4.3) | 3.7 (2.4–4.8) | 0.060† |
| PreAlb (mg/dl) | 9.6 (4.5–19.0) | 13.0 (4.2–33.1) | 0.055† |
| BTR | 3.7±1.4 (1.7–7.4) | 4.1±1.5 (1.5–8.0) | 0.160* |
| CRP | 0.1 (0.1–3.5) | 0.1 (0.1–6.9) | 0.501† |
| Crn | 0.72 (0.46–1.13) | 0.76 (0.44–4.91) | 0.644† |
| FPG (mg/dl) | 102 (88–207) | 101 (74–351) | 0.360† |
| IRI (µU/ml) | 14 (2–40) | 11 (1–84) | 0.165† |
| HOMA-IR | 3.48 (0.62–12.10) | 2.58 (0.19–43.30) | 0.166† |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.4 (4.5–7.7) | 5.3 (4.1–10.2) | 0.937† |
| ICG test retention rate at 15 min (%) | 28.9 (8.5–75.6) | 22.1 (3.5–68.0) | 0.182† |
| Type 4 collagen 7S (ng/ml) | 7.2 (4.2–10.0) | 6.6 (3.0–16.0) | 0.364† |
| HA (ng/ml) | 297.8 (88.5–1160.3) | 299.6 (12.4–3968.6) | 0.840† |
| AFP (ng/ml) | 80 (5–94260) | 17 (2–14183) | 0.058† |
| DCP | 453 (16–148950) | 91 (14–7138) | 0.0002† |
Data represent n, mean±SD (range), or median (range).
The data were evaluated with the *two-sample t-test, †Wilcoxon rank sum test, or ¶Fisher's exact test as appropriate.
Univariate analyses comparing several factor ratios (7 days after/before TACE) between the one-year mortality group and the survival group after TACE (n = 100).
| Factor ratio | One-year mortality group | One-year survival group | p value |
| (7 days after/before TACE) | n = 22 | n = 78 | |
| npRQ | 0.95 (0.76–1.04) | 1.00 (0.81–1.25) | 0.0003† |
| REE | 1.01 (0.88–1.12) | 0.97 (0.78–1.22) | 0.125† |
| Lymphocytes | 0.70 (0.40–2.23) | 0.81 (0.41–2.22) | 0.112† |
| PT | 0.92 (0.60–1.11) | 0.96 (0.79–1.23) | 0.039† |
| T-Bil | 1.53 (0.80–2.26) | 1.16 (0.50–3.00) | 0.002† |
| ChE | 0.70±0.10 (0.55–0.91) | 0.83±0.15 (0.47–1.17) | 0.0001* |
| Alb | 0.83±0.06 (0.67–0.96) | 0.89±0.10 (0.59–1.17) | 0.006* |
| PreAlb | 0.52 (0.34–0.78) | 0.66 (0.22–1.56) | 0.001† |
| AST | 1.03 (0.54–2.13) | 0.89 (0.30–3.92) | 0.068† |
| ALT | 1.65 (0.84–17.67) | 1.30 (0.36–12.08) | 0.042† |
| γ-GTP | 1.05 (0.79–3.11) | 0.97 (0.52–1.86) | 0.306† |
| BTR | 1.13±0.33 (0.52–1.71) | 1.10±0.27 (0.63–1.94) | 0.694* |
| CRP | 16.5 (1.3–97.2) | 8.2 (0.1–62.7) | 0.054† |
| Total oral intake | 0.8 (0.2–1.0) | 0.9 (0.1–1.0) | 0.092† |
| Febrile duration (days) | 4 (0–7) | 3 (0–7) | 0.257† |
Data represent mean ± SD (range) or median (range).
The data were evaluated with the *two-sample t-test or †Wilcoxon rank sum test as appropriate.
P values shown in bold are statistically significant.
Forward selection logistic regression analyses comparing the significant univariate factors in Tables 1 and 2.
| Step | Factor | B | SE | p value | Exp(B) | 95% CI of EXP(B) | |
| upper limit | lower limit | ||||||
| Step 1 | CLIP score | 1.40 | 0.354 | 0.000 | 4.070 | 2.035 | 8.140 |
| constant | −3.93 | 0.807 | 0.000 | 0.020 | |||
| Step 2 | BCLC stage | 2.65 | 1.044 | 0.011 | 14.142 | 1.826 | 109.508 |
| CLIP score | 0.90 | 0.364 | 0.014 | 2.458 | 1.204 | 5.020 | |
| constant | −7.78 | 2.088 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| Step 3 | npRQ ratio | −13.87 | 5.654 | 0.014 | 9.48E-07 | 1.46E-11 | 0.062 |
| BCLC stage | 2.77 | 1.080 | 0.010 | 15.963 | 1.923 | 132.499 | |
| CLIP score | 0.93 | 0.376 | 0.013 | 2.533 | 1.212 | 5.295 | |
| constant | 5.52 | 5.427 | 0.309 | 249.744 | |||
B: regression coefficient; CI: confidence interval; Exp(B): odds ratio; SE: standard error.
Area under ROC (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each independent factor associated with 1-year mortality after TACE.
| Multivariate factor | AUC | 95% CI |
| npRQ ratio | 0.611 | 0.508 to 0.707 |
| BCLC stage | 0.700 | 0.600 to 0.787 |
| CLIP score | 0.811 | 0.720 to 0.882 |
Each AUC of npRQ ratio, BCLC stage, and CLIP score had a good ability to discriminate between the 1-year mortality group and the survival group after TACE.
Figure 1Pairwise comparison of ROC curves of time-dependent and time-fixed prognostic factors associated with 1-year mortality after TACE.
Using the DeLong method with Bonferroni correction, pairwise comparison of ROC curves was performed. There were significant differences between the AUC of npRQ ratio and that of CLIP score (p = 0.019), and no significant differences between the AUC of npRQ ratio and that of BCLC stage (p = 0.592). There were no significant differences between the AUC of BCLC stage and that of CLIP score (p = 0.094), but The AUC of CLIP score was higher than that of BCLC stage (0.811 vs. 0.700). So, CLIP score was a better index than the BCLC stage.
Figure 2Pairwise comparison of ROC curves of CLIP score alone and combination factor (CLIP score and npRQ ratio) associated with 1-year mortality after TACE.
Using the DeLong method with Bonferroni correction, pairwise comparison of ROC curves was performed. There were no significant differences between the AUC of CLIP score alone and that of combination factor (p = 0.061), but the AUC of combination factor was higher than that of CLIP score alone (0.861 vs. 0.811). The combination factor (CLIP score and npRQ score) was the best index for prediction of 1-year mortality after TACE.
Sensitivity and specificity of each independent factor for predicting 1-year mortality after TACE.
| A. npRQ ratio | ||
| Optimal cut-off point | 1-year mortality group | 1-year survival group |
| npRQ: 1.00 | n = 22 | n = 78 |
| <1.00 | 16 (72.7%) | 27 (34.6%) |
| ≥1.00 | 6 (27.3%) | 51 (65.4%)** |
Predictive score by combination of CLIP score and npRQ ratio was estimated as follows: 1-(1/(1+EXP(1.451×CLIPscore-12.225×npRQ ratio+7.993))).
Sensitivity, **Specificity.
Figure 3A score card implemented by rounding off the odds ratios of time-dependent and time-fixed prognostic factors associated with 1-year mortality after TACE in the multivariate model.
Using the optimal cut-off points, each of npRQ ratio and CLIP score was classified into two categories. We created a score card by rounding off the odds ratios of the two factors in the multivariate model. Patient-specific 1-year mortality risk scores can be calculated by summarizing the individual risk scores and looking up the patient-specific risk on the graph.
Figure 4Overall survival according to each time-dependent and time-fixed prognostic factor in 100 patients with HCC after TACE.
Overall survival was significantly shorter in the npRQ reduction group (npRQ ratio<1.0) than in the no-reduction group (npRQ ratio≥1.0) (p = 0.034) (Figure 3A). In addition, the higher the BCLC stage and CLIP score became, the significantly shorter the overall survival was (p = 0.000 and 0.000, respectively) (Figure 3B, C). All of these factors correctly differentiated survival for patients in different classes.