Literature DB >> 2352008

Passive warming of airway gases (artificial nose) improves accuracy of esophageal temperature monitoring.

M N Siegel1, N Gravenstein.   

Abstract

The most efficient site for monitoring heart and lung sounds by esophageal stethoscope is not the warmest segment of the esophagus. This study investigated the ability of passive warming of airway gases to increase the accuracy of temperatures measured at this site (i.e., to decrease their difference from core temperature). In 15 adult patients undergoing general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation, esophageal temperatures were measured before and after use of a heat and moisture exchanger (an artificial nose) that passively warmed inspired gases. The resulting values were compared with nasopharyngeal temperatures, which represented core temperature. Before use of the heat and moisture exchanger, esophageal and nasopharyngeal temperatures differed significantly (mean difference +/- SD, 0.9 +/- 0.4 degrees C; P less than or equal to 0.001). After passive warming of inspired gases, esophageal temperatures increased significantly (mean increase +/- SD, 0.5 +/- 0.2 degrees C; P less than or equal to 0.001) but inconsistently (range, 0.1 to 1.2 degrees C). However, the mean difference between esophageal and nasopharyngeal temperatures was still significant (0.5 +/- 0.3 degrees C; P less than 0.001). Discrepancies between esophageal and core temperatures persist when a currently available esophageal stethoscope with adjacent auscultation chamber and temperature probe is used, despite passive warming of airway gases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2352008     DOI: 10.1007/bf02828283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of temperatures measured in the rectum, oesophagus, and on the surface of the aorta during hypothermia in man.

Authors:  K E COOPER; J R KENYON
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1957-05       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Relationship between esophageal temperature gradient and heart and lung sounds heard by esophageal stethoscope.

Authors:  R D Kaufman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Esophageal temperature during exercise in asthmatic and nonasthmatic subjects.

Authors:  E C Deal; E R McFadden; R H Ingram; J J Jaeger
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1979-03

4.  Perforation of the tympanic membrane, a complication of tympanic thermometry during anesthesia.

Authors:  C T Wallace; W E Marks; W Y Adkins; J E Mahaffey
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Temperature differences in the oesophagus. Preliminary study.

Authors:  J D Whitby; L J Dunkin
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Clinical temperature. New physiological basis.

Authors:  T H Benzinger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1969-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Precision and accuracy of intraoperative temperature monitoring.

Authors:  R C Cork; R W Vaughan; L S Humphrey
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.108

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Temperature control and the role of supplemental oxygen.

Authors:  Vance Y Sohn; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

Review 2.  Temperature management in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Hesham Saad; Mostafa Aladawy
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2013-11-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.