| Literature DB >> 23519844 |
Agnieszka M Gruszecka1, Magdalena Wdowin.
Abstract
The lead-zinc industry in the Bukowno region of southern Poland has polluted the surface layer of the surrounding soils mainly with lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), zinc (Zn), arsenic (As), and thallium (Tl). Analysis of six soil profiles, taken on the east side of the postflotation waste site of the Mining and Metallurgical Plants ZGH "Bolesław" in Bukowno, showed that they were podzol soils, taking form of loose sands with neutral pH and reducing conditions. Concentration of organic matter in the horizons ranged from 2 to 80 %. The main components of the mineral soil were quartz, carbonates, K-feldspars, plagioclases, and micas (sericite). The highest total concentrations of metals were found in the O, A, and B horizons. Over 90 % of the Cd content, 80 % of the Pb content, 60 % of the Zn content, ∼60 % of the Tl content, and 20 % of the As content occurred as mobile forms. The corresponding total concentrations were 10 mg/kg Cd, 922 mg/kg Pb, 694 mg/kg Zn, <1 mg/kg Tl, and <5 mg/kg As. This can potentially be taken up from the soil and transported in the trophic chain. Comparing the total metal content with the legal limits in Poland, it is observed, that the investigated soils exceeded the permissible levels of Cd, Pb, and Zn for agricultural soils. Arsenic and Tl are not reflected in the chemical quality of soil classifications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23519844 PMCID: PMC3759736 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3164-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Monit Assess ISSN: 0167-6369 Impact factor: 2.513
Fig. 1Location of soil profiles I–VI (based on the topographic map in the “1992” reference system, in scale 1:10,000, sheets: M-34-64-A-a-1, M-34-64-A-a-2, M-34-64-A-a-3, and M-34-64-A-a-4)
Fig. 2Laboratory procedure scheme
Fig. 3Formation of the soil profiles on the east side of the postflotation waste site ZGH “Bolesław” in Bukowno
Average mineral composition for individual soil horizons
| Soil horizon | Transmitted light | XRD and SEM analysis |
|---|---|---|
| O | Quartz (places regenerative quartz), K-feldspars (often kaolinitization)–microcline, plagioclases, organic matter, ore minerals, chalcedony, sericite, individual carbonates, clay minerals (e.g., glauconite), fragments of rocks (sandstones) | Quartz, Fe-dolomite/ankerite, plagioclases, K-feldspars, apatite |
| A | Quartz (places regenerative quartz), K-feldspars (places kaolinitization)–microcline, goethite, individual carbonates, organic matter, ore minerals, clay minerals, sericite | Quartz, Fe-dolomite, calcite, pyrite, probably in trace amount–barite, K-feldspar, plagioclases, carbonates |
| E | Quartz (regenerative quartz), K-feldspars (places sericitization and kaolinitization)–microcline, iron oxides, plagioclases (often illitization and diagenesis of grain is observed), single grains of chalcedony, goethite, muscovite (occasionally), sericite, organic matter (occasionally), single grains of glauconite, single carbonates, colophane, iron oxides | Quartz, carbonates (Fe-dolomite), K-feldspars, plagioclases, gypsum, sphalerite, pyrite, Fe-dolomite |
| B | Larger grain of quartz (regenerative quartz), single K-feldspars (places sericitization and kaolinitization), carbonates, fine crystalline clay-iron matter, sericite with organic matter, goethite, plagioclases (places illitization), ore minerals, organic matter | Quartz, K-feldspars, plagioclases, carbonates (calcite), Fe-dolomite, gypsum, pyrite, barite |
| C | Quartz (places regenerative quartz), K-feldspars (places sericitization and kaolinitization), glauconite, chalcedony, goethite | Quartz, K-feldspars, plagioclases |
Fig. 4XRD diffraction patterns of soil horizons on the east side of the postflotation waste site in Bukowno
Fig. 5Examples of SEM microphotographs of soil horizons on the east site of the postflotation waste site in Bukowno
Physical properties and total metal concentration in soil profiles
| Soil horizon | pH (KCl) | pH (H2O) | Eh (mV) | OM (%) | Total concentration (mg/kg d.m.) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As | Cd | Pb | Tl | Zn | |||||
| Profile I | |||||||||
| O | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| A | 8.0 | 7.7 | −78 | 60 | 13.6 | 13.3 | 1,103 | 1.90 | 883 |
| E | 7.1 | 6.9 | −27 | 10 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 43 | 0.79 | 136 |
| B | 7.1 | 7.0 | −56 | 10 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 307 | 0.28 | 145 |
| C | 7.1 | 6.9 | −23 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 37 | 0.02 | 32 |
| Profile II | |||||||||
| O | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| A | 7.0 | 6.8 | 21 | 30 | 18.5 | 10.4 | 454 | 1.10 | 831 |
| E | 7.2 | 7.2 | −49 | 10 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 35 | 0.14 | 69 |
| B | 7.1 | 7.1 | −33 | 20 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 173 | 0.26 | 167 |
| C | 7.1 | 7.1 | −38 | 2 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 36 | 0.01 | 33 |
| Profile III | |||||||||
| O | 6.6 | 6.7 | −21 | 80 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 625 | 0.03 | 298 |
| A | 6.6 | 7.1 | −32 | 41 | 1.8 | 7.3 | 286 | 0.15 | 390 |
| E | 7.0 | 6.8 | −19 | 10 | 0.9 | 7.1 | 48 | 0.22 | 78 |
| B | 6.9 | 6.8 | −35 | 10 | 2.6 | 27.0 | 2354 | 0.10 | 1,352 |
| C | 7.3 | 7.0 | −30 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 37 | 0.01 | 36 |
| Profile IV | |||||||||
| O | 7.9 | 8.0 | −34 | 40 | 10.7 | 8.8 | 1,044 | 1.44 | 1,474 |
| A | 7.3 | 6.8 | −23 | 34 | 4.8 | 76.9 | 4,181 | 4.50 | 5,254 |
| E | 6.8 | 6.0 | −10 | 7 | 1.0 | 14.9 | 306 | 2.51 | 995 |
| B | 7.6 | 7.0 | −31 | 10 | 100.0 | 40.9 | 2,564 | 6.53 | 3,329 |
| C | 7.2 | 7.4 | −54 | 2 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 37 | 0.05 | 114 |
| Profile V | |||||||||
| O | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| A | 7.0 | 7.5 | −37 | 20 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 48 | 0.07 | 205 |
| E | 6.7 | 7.5 | −45 | 20 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 21 | 0.02 | 53 |
| B | 6.5 | 7.6 | −20 | 20 | 0.8 | 6.0 | 124 | 0.22 | 90 |
| C | 7.1 | 7.6 | −58 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 36 | 0.01 | 41 |
| Profile VI | |||||||||
| O | 7.0 | 7.1 | −57 | 60 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 109 | 0.55 | 415 |
| A | 7.0 | 7.3 | −47 | 50 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 47 | 0.07 | 120 |
| E | 7.2 | 7.0 | −37 | 10 | 0.04 | 0.9 | 23 | 0.03 | 65 |
| B | 7.1 | 7.3 | −52 | 20 | 4.6 | 1.0 | 22 | 0.23 | 66 |
| C | 7.1 | 7.3 | −51 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 11 | 0.01 | 276 |
(–) lack of horizon
Total contents of metals in the topsoil and their permissible levels by Polish law
| As | Cd | Pb | Tl | Zn | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soil profile | I | II | III | IV | V | VI | I | II | III | IV | V | VI | I | II | III | IV | V | VI | I | II | III | IV | V | VI | I | II | III | IV | V | VI |
| Content | 9.2 | 9.3 | 4.0 | 11.7 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 1.6 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 202 | 184 | 133 | 151 | 20 | 39 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 368 | 372 | 157 | 609 | 170 | 79 |
| g.b. | 2 | 0,2 | 18 | 1 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0° | – | 0,3 | 20 | – | 50 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| I° | – | 1 | 70 | – | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| II° | – | 2 | 100 | – | 200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| III° | – | 3 | 500 | – | 700 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IV° | – | 5 | 2,500 | – | 1,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| V° | – | >5 | >2,500 | – | >1,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A | 20 | 1 | 50 | – | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| B | 20 | 4 | 100 | – | 300 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| C | 60 | 15 | 600 | – | 1,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
g.b. geochemical background (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias 2001), A group A (RME 2002), B group B (RME 2002), C group C (RME 2002), (–) not determined
Permissible concentrations of metals in soils by Polish guidelines
| Permissible metals concentration classifications | As | Cd | Pb | Tl | Zn | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg/kg d.m. | ||||||
| Geochemical background (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias | ||||||
| Natural element concentration | 2 | 0.2 | 18 | 1 | 30 | |
| Chemical quality grades of soil by IUNG (Kabata-Pendias et al. | ||||||
| 0° | Soil not contaminated, the natural content of heavy metals | – | 0,3 | 20 | – | 50 |
| I° | Soils with elevated concentrations of heavy metals | – | 1 | 70 | – | 100 |
| II° | Weakly contaminated soils | – | 2 | 100 | – | 200 |
| III° | Medium contaminated soils | – | 3 | 500 | – | 700 |
| IV° | Heavily contaminated soils | – | 5 | 2,500 | – | 1,500 |
| V° | Very heavily contaminated soils | – | >5 | >2,500 | – | >1,500 |
| Types of ground Regulation of the Minister of the Environment (GJ No. 165/2002 pos. 1359) | ||||||
| Group A | Protected areas based on the | 20 | 1 | 50 | – | 100 |
| Group B | Agricultural land, forest land and trees, woodland and shrubs | 20 | 4 | 100 | – | 300 |
| Group C | Industrial areas, minerals, communication areas | 60 | 15 | 600 | – | 1,000 |
(–) not determined
Fig. 6Binding forms of metals as a percentage of the total metal content in soil profiles