Literature DB >> 23519787

Genotoxicity of nanomaterials: refining strategies and tests for hazard identification.

Stefan Pfuhler, Rosalie Elespuru, Marilyn J Aardema, Shareen H Doak, E Maria Donner, Masamitsu Honma, Micheline Kirsch-Volders, Robert Landsiedel, Mugimane Manjanatha, Tim Singer, James H Kim.   

Abstract

A workshop addressing strategies for the genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials (NMs) was held on October 23, 2010 in Fort Worth Texas, USA. The workshop was organized by the Environmental Mutagen Society and the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Health and Environmental Sciences Institute. The workshop was attended by more than 80 participants from academia, regulatory agencies, and industry from North America, Europe and Japan. A plenary session featured summaries of the current status and issues related to the testing of NMs for genotoxic properties, as well as an update on international activities and regulatory approaches. This was followed by breakout sessions and a plenary session devoted to independent discussions of in vitro assays, in vivo assays, and the need for new assays or new approaches to develop a testing strategy for NMs. Each of the standard assays was critiqued as a resource for evaluation of NMs, and it became apparent that none was appropriate without special considerations or modifications. The need for nanospecific positive controls was questioned, as was the utility of bacterial assays. The latter was thought to increase the importance of including mammalian cell gene mutation assays into the test battery. For in-vivo testing, to inform the selection of appropriate tests or protocols, it was suggested to run repeated dose studies first to learn about disposition, potential accumulation, and possible tissue damage. It was acknowledged that mechanisms may be at play that a standard genotoxicity battery may not be able to capture.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23519787     DOI: 10.1002/em.21770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  5 in total

1.  Evaluating the genotoxicity of urban PM2.5 using PCR-based methods in human lung cells and the Salmonella TA98 reverse test.

Authors:  Deborah Traversi; Piero Cervella; Giorgio Gilli
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Genotoxicity of Graphene-Based Materials.

Authors:  Josefa Domenech; Adriana Rodríguez-Garraus; Adela López de Cerain; Amaya Azqueta; Julia Catalán
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 5.719

3.  Safety assessment of nanomaterials using an advanced decision-making framework, the DF4nanoGrouping.

Authors:  Robert Landsiedel; Lan Ma-Hock; Karin Wiench; Wendel Wohlleben; Ursula G Sauer
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  ToxTracker Reporter Cell Lines as a Tool for Mechanism-Based (geno)Toxicity Screening of Nanoparticles-Metals, Oxides and Quantum Dots.

Authors:  Sarah McCarrick; Francesca Cappellini; Amanda Kessler; Nynke Moelijker; Remco Derr; Jonas Hedberg; Susanna Wold; Eva Blomberg; Inger Odnevall Wallinder; Giel Hendriks; Hanna L Karlsson
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 5.  A systematic quality evaluation and review of nanomaterial genotoxicity studies: a regulatory perspective.

Authors:  Kirsi K Siivola; Michael J Burgum; Blanca Suárez-Merino; Martin J D Clift; Shareen H Doak; Julia Catalán
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 9.112

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.