Literature DB >> 23519559

Effects of long-term in vitro culturing of transgenic bovine donor fibroblasts on cell viability and in vitro developmental potential after nuclear transfer.

F F Bressan1, M S Miranda, M C Bajgelman, F Perecin, L G Mesquita, P Fantinato-Neto, G F K Merighe, B E Strauss, F V Meirelles.   

Abstract

Genetically modified animals have numerous applications, ranging from basic research to livestock production and agriculture. Recent progress in animal cloning by nuclear transfer has made possible the production of transgenic animals using previously genetically modified cell lineages. However, to produce such lineages, an additional time for in vitro culturing and great manipulation is needed. Herein, we aimed to characterize different aspects of genetically modified cells compared to control cells, and we also analyzed the development rate of embryos produced by nuclear transfer by using them as nuclei donors after short or long periods of in vitro culturing (early versus late passages). We hypothesized that the genetic material inserted in the genome of these cells, associated with the prolonged time in culture, ultimately alters cell growth physiology and cell viability, which leads to impaired nuclei reprogramming potential and consequent reduction in the production of cloned blastocysts. Fetal fibroblasts expressing the enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein gene (eGFP) cultured for different periods in vitro were analyzed with respect to chromosomal numeric abnormalities, nuclear DNA fragmentation, the ratio of BAX and BCL2 gene transcripts, and the intensity of mitochondrial membrane potential, and they were then used as nuclei donors for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Early passages were defined as fewer than 11 passages, and late passages were 18th passage (18(th)p) to 21(st)p. No differences were observed in the percentage of cells with chromosomal abnormalities or in the mitochondrial membrane potential analysis. eGFP cells in late passages and control cells in early passages were not different regarding DNA fragmentation; however, control cells in late passages presented higher fragmentation (P < 0.05). The Bax and Bcl2 gene expression ratio in control and transgenic cells presented different patterns regarding cell conditions during culture. For SCNT experiments, no difference was observed between groups reconstructed with early or late-passage cells when fusion (63.1% and 49%), cleavage (67.7% and 69.9%), eight-cell embryo (36.4% and 44.4%) and blastocyst (21.6% and 20.8%) rates were compared. In conclusion, culture behavior was different between control and eGFP cells. However, when different in vitro culturing periods were compared, long-term cultured transgenic fetal fibroblasts remained competent for blastocyst production when used as nuclei donors in the nuclear transfer technique, a feature needed for the genetic manipulation of cell culture experiments aiming for transgenic animal production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23519559     DOI: 10.1007/s11626-013-9592-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim        ISSN: 1071-2690            Impact factor:   2.416


  28 in total

1.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method.

Authors:  K J Livak; T D Schmittgen
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  Effect of oxidative stress on development and DNA damage in in-vitro cultured bovine embryos by comet assay.

Authors:  M Takahashi; K Keicho; H Takahashi; H Ogawa; R M Schultz; A Okano
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  The methods to generate transgenic animals and to control transgene expression.

Authors:  Louis-Marie Houdebine
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2002-09-25       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression.

Authors:  M Chalfie; Y Tu; G Euskirchen; W W Ward; D C Prasher
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-02-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Developmental potential and transgene expression of porcine nuclear transfer embryos using somatic cells.

Authors:  D B Koo; Y K Kang; Y H Choi; J S Park; H N Kim; T Kim; K K Lee; Y M Han
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.609

6.  Stable genetic modification of human embryonic stem cells by lentiviral vectors.

Authors:  Michal Gropp; Pavel Itsykson; Orna Singer; Tamir Ben-Hur; Etti Reinhartz; Eithan Galun; Benjamin E Reubinoff
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 11.454

7.  Transgene expression of green fluorescent protein and germ line transmission in cloned calves derived from in vitro-transfected somatic cells.

Authors:  Vilceu Bordignon; Rebecca Keyston; Anthoula Lazaris; Annie S Bilodeau; José H F Pontes; Daniel Arnold; Gilles Fecteau; Carol Keefer; Lawrence C Smith
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2003-01-08       Impact factor: 4.285

8.  Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection.

Authors:  R E Hammer; V G Pursel; C E Rexroad; R J Wall; D J Bolt; K M Ebert; R D Palmiter; R L Brinster
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jun 20-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Dramatic growth of mice that develop from eggs microinjected with metallothionein-growth hormone fusion genes.

Authors:  R D Palmiter; R L Brinster; R E Hammer; M E Trumbauer; M G Rosenfeld; N C Birnberg; R M Evans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Gene targeting in livestock: a preview.

Authors:  A J Clark; S Burl; C Denning; P Dickinson
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.145

View more
  3 in total

1.  Zygote injection of RNA encoding Cre recombinase results in efficient removal of LoxP flanked neomycin cassettes in pigs.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Raissa Cecil; Joshua A Benne; Bethany K Redel; Lee D Spate; Melissa S Samuel; Randall S Prather; Kevin D Wells
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from large domestic animals.

Authors:  Fabiana Fernandes Bressan; Vinícius Bassanezze; Laís Vicari de Figueiredo Pessôa; Chester Bittencourt Sacramento; Tathiane Maistro Malta; Simone Kashima; Paulo Fantinato Neto; Ricardo De Francisco Strefezzi; Naira Caroline Godoy Pieri; José Eduardo Krieger; Dimas Tadeu Covas; Flávio Vieira Meirelles
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 6.832

3.  Xenotransplantation of canine spermatogonial stem cells (cSSCs) regulated by FSH promotes spermatogenesis in infertile mice.

Authors:  Naira Caroline Godoy Pieri; Ana Carolina Furlanetto Mançanares; Aline Fernanda de Souza; Hugo Fernandes; Angela Maria Gonella Diaza; Fabiana Fernandes Bressan; Kelly Cristine Santos Roballo; Juliana Barbosa Casals; Mario Binelli; Carlos Eduardo Ambrósio; Daniele Dos Santos Martins
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 6.832

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.