BACKGROUND: Gastric bypass is the "gold standard" procedure of bariatric surgery. However, 20.4-34.9% of these patients may fail to achieve or maintain the weight loss on long-term follow-up and may require additional procedures. StomaphyX has been promoted for weight reduction in such patients. OBJECTIVES: To study whether endoluminal reduction of gastric pouch and stoma using StomaphyX results in sustained weight loss in patients who regain weight after gastric bypass. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on 59 postgastric bypass patients who underwent revision of gastric pouch using StomaphyX from 2007 to 2008. Postprocedure weight at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months follow-up as well as weight at the time of the review was recorded for each patient. RESULTS: Average weight loss and excess body weight loss (EBWL) were 2.6 ± 2.3 kg and 7.3 ± 7.1% (n = 42) at 1 week, 3.7 ± 2.9 kg and 11.6 ± 12.1% (n = 31) at 1 month, and 3.8 ± 4.5 kg and 11.5 ± 17.9% (n = 10) at 6 months respectively. At the time of review, the average follow-up was 41 months, average weight loss was 1.7 ± 9.7 kg, and EBWL was 4.3 ± 29.8% (n = 53). Endoscopy in 12 patients at average 18 months follow-up showed no sustained reduction in pouch and stoma size. CONCLUSIONS: StomaphyX results in weight loss that is not sustained on long-term follow-up. Pouch and stoma tend to regain their preprocedure size on follow-up. StomaphyX cannot be recommended as a weight loss strategy in postgastric bypass patients who regain weight.
BACKGROUND: Gastric bypass is the "gold standard" procedure of bariatric surgery. However, 20.4-34.9% of these patients may fail to achieve or maintain the weight loss on long-term follow-up and may require additional procedures. StomaphyX has been promoted for weight reduction in such patients. OBJECTIVES: To study whether endoluminal reduction of gastric pouch and stoma using StomaphyX results in sustained weight loss in patients who regain weight after gastric bypass. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on 59 postgastric bypass patients who underwent revision of gastric pouch using StomaphyX from 2007 to 2008. Postprocedure weight at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months follow-up as well as weight at the time of the review was recorded for each patient. RESULTS: Average weight loss and excess body weight loss (EBWL) were 2.6 ± 2.3 kg and 7.3 ± 7.1% (n = 42) at 1 week, 3.7 ± 2.9 kg and 11.6 ± 12.1% (n = 31) at 1 month, and 3.8 ± 4.5 kg and 11.5 ± 17.9% (n = 10) at 6 months respectively. At the time of review, the average follow-up was 41 months, average weight loss was 1.7 ± 9.7 kg, and EBWL was 4.3 ± 29.8% (n = 53). Endoscopy in 12 patients at average 18 months follow-up showed no sustained reduction in pouch and stoma size. CONCLUSIONS: StomaphyX results in weight loss that is not sustained on long-term follow-up. Pouch and stoma tend to regain their preprocedure size on follow-up. StomaphyX cannot be recommended as a weight loss strategy in postgastric bypass patients who regain weight.
Authors: Brian A Coakley; Clifford W Deveney; Donn H Spight; Sarah K Thompson; David Le; Blair A Jobe; Bruce M Wolfe; Donald B McConnell; Robert W O'Rourke Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2007-12-11 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: I Michael Leitman; Chiranjiv S Virk; Dimitrios V Avgerinos; Radha Patel; Valentina Lavarias; Burton Surick; John L Holup; Elliot R Goodman; Martin S Karpeh Journal: JSLS Date: 2010 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Ben Gys; Philip Plaeke; Bas Lamme; Thierry Lafullarde; Niels Komen; Anthony Beunis; Guy Hubens Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: H Mason Hedberg; Alexander Trenk; Kristine Kuchta; John G Linn; JoAnn Carbray; Michael B Ujiki Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Lava Y Patel; Brittany Lapin; Craig S Brown; Thomas Stringer; Matthew E Gitelis; John G Linn; Woody E Denham; Elizabeth Farwell; Stephen Haggerty; Michael B Ujiki Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: M Gitelis; M Ujiki; L Farwell; J Linn; C Wang; K Miller; C Sula; J Carbray; S Haggerty; W Denham Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-12-06 Impact factor: 4.584