Literature DB >> 23519042

Cancer rehabilitation: outcome evaluation of a strengthening and conditioning program.

Karen K Swenson1, Mary Jo Nissen, Kathryn Knippenberg, Annemiek Sistermans, Paul Spilde, Elaine M Bell, Julia Nissen, Cathleen Chen, Michaela L Tsai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer treatments can lead to detriments in patients' health and declines in quality of life (QOL). Cancer rehabilitation programs may improve functional status, symptom control, and QOL.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if an outpatient, physical therapy-supervised Cancer Rehabilitation Strengthening and Conditioning (CRSC) program improved patients' conditioning level, functional status, QOL, and symptoms.
METHODS: This was a prospective study of oncology patients participating in CRSC program. Measurements included conditioning level (6-minute walk test [SMWT], metabolic equivalent level, grip strength), functional status (Physical Component Summary of Short Form 36), QOL (Mental Component Summary of Short Form 36), and symptoms (M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory). Paired t tests were conducted to determine significant changes between pre- and post-CRSC program measures, and regression methods identified predictors of change from baseline.
RESULTS: One hundred fifteen patients with cancer were enrolled in the study; 75 patients completed pre- and post-CRSC program measures. Significant improvements were noted in SMWT by 186.4 ft, SMWT speed by 0.35 mph, treadmill time (3.5 minutes longer), metabolic equivalent level (by 0.87 units), QOL, symptom severity, symptom interference with daily life, fatigue, shortness of breath, and sadness.
CONCLUSIONS: In a pretest-posttest design, significant improvements were noted in conditioning level, functional status, QOL, and symptoms. Greater improvements were noted in participants who were most deconditioned at baseline. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Further research should be conducted to provide additional support for CRSC programs. Cancer rehabilitation strengthening and condition programs may benefit patients across the continuum of care, including deconditioned patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23519042     DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e318288d429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Nurs        ISSN: 0162-220X            Impact factor:   2.592


  4 in total

1.  Community-based exercise programs for cancer survivors: a scoping review of practice-based evidence.

Authors:  Kelley R Covington; Mary C Hidde; Mackenzi Pergolotti; Heather J Leach
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  An Integrative Review of Nonpharmacological Interventions to Improve Sleep among Adults with Advanced Serious Illness.

Authors:  Elizabeth Capezuti; Rana Sagha Zadeh; Nicole Woody; Aleksa Basara; Ana C Krieger
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  Perioperative physical exercise interventions for patients undergoing lung cancer surgery: What is the evidence?

Authors:  Carlotta Mainini; Patrícia Fs Rebelo; Roberta Bardelli; Besa Kopliku; Sara Tenconi; Stefania Costi; Claudio Tedeschi; Stefania Fugazzaro
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2016-10-19

4.  Exercise interventions for people diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review of implementation outcomes.

Authors:  Louise Czosnek; Justin Richards; Eva Zopf; Prue Cormie; Simon Rosenbaum; Nicole M Rankin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 4.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.