Literature DB >> 23518207

Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.

V A R Barão1, J A Delben, J Lima, T Cabral, W G Assunção.   

Abstract

A finite element analysis was used to compare the effect of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible. Four models of an human mandible were constructed. In the OR (O'ring) group, the mandible was restored with an overdenture retained by four unsplinted implants with O'ring attachment; in the BC (bar-clip) -C and BC groups, the mandibles were restored with overdentures retained by four splinted implants with bar-clip anchor associated or not with two distally placed cantilevers, respectively; in the FD (fixed denture) group, the mandible was restored with a fixed full-arch four-implant-supported prosthesis. Models were supported by the masticatory muscles and temporomandibular joints. A 100-N oblique load was applied on the left first molar. Von Mises (σvM), maximum (σmax) and minimum (σmin) principal stresses (in MPa) analyses were obtained. BC-C group exhibited the highest stress values (σvM=398.8, σmax=580.5 and σmin=-455.2) while FD group showed the lowest one (σvM=128.9, σmax=185.9 and σmin=-172.1). Within overdenture groups, the use of unsplinted implants reduced the stress level in the implant/prosthetic components (59.4% for σvM, 66.2% for σmax and 57.7% for σmin versus BC-C group) and supporting tissues (maximum stress reduction of 72% and 79.5% for σmax, and 15.7% and 85.7% for σmin on the cortical and trabecular bones, respectively). Cortical bone exhibited greater stress concentration than the trabecular bone for all groups. The use of fixed implant dentures and removable dentures retained by unsplinted implants to rehabilitate edentulous mandible reduced the stresses in the periimplant bone tissue, mucosa and implant/prosthetic components.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23518207     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  13 in total

1.  Effect of attachment type on load distribution to implant abutments and the residual ridge in mandibular implant-supported overdentures.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Yoda; Yoshiki Matsudate; Masaru Abue; Guang Hong; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2015-03-16

2.  Biomechanical 3-dimensional finite element analysis of obturator protheses retained with zygomatic and dental implants in maxillary defects.

Authors:  Canan Akay; Suat Yaluğ
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-02-25

3.  Influence of Trabecular Bone on Peri-Implant Stress and Strain Based on Micro-CT Finite Element Modeling of Beagle Dog.

Authors:  Sheng-Hui Liao; Xing-Hao Zhu; Jing Xie; Vikesh Kumar Sohodeb; Xi Ding
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Dental implant treatment in a young woman after marginal mandibulectomy for treatment of mandibular gingival carcinoma: a case report.

Authors:  Kazuki Takaoka; Emi Segawa; Michiyo Yamamura; Yusuke Zushi; Masahiro Urade; Hiromitsu Kishimoto
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-08-04

5.  Impact of fixed implant supported prostheses in edentulous patients: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Carolina S López; Constanza H Saka; Gabriel Rada; Daniela D Valenzuela
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Comparative three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported fixed complete arch mandibular prostheses in two materials.

Authors:  João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Dayana Campanelli de Morais; Alexandre Abhdala Alonso; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alexandre Luis Souto Borges
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

7.  Effect of implant- and occlusal load location on stress distribution in Locator attachments of mandibular overdenture. A finite element study.

Authors:  Angel Alvarez-Arenal; Ignacio Gonzalez-Gonzalez; Hector deLlanos-Lanchares; Elena Martin-Fernandez; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; Joseba Ellacuria-Echebarria
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Evaluation of stress distribution of porous tantalum and solid titanium implant-assisted overdenture in the mandible: A finite element study.

Authors:  Ayshin Akbarzadeh; Yasser Hemmati; Fariba Saleh-Saber
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-12-10

Review 9.  Biomechanics of oral mucosa.

Authors:  Junning Chen; Rohana Ahmad; Wei Li; Michael Swain; Qing Li
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the splinted implant prosthesis in a reconstructed mandible.

Authors:  Kyung-Hoi Heo; Young-Jun Lim; Myung-Joo Kim; Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.