Yusheng Qu1, Baoxi Gao, Mei Fang, Hugo M Vargas. 1. Safety and Exploratory Pharmacology, Toxicological Sciences, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, USA. yqu@amgen.com
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac safety is of paramount importance in contemporary drug development. Efficient and sensitive evaluation of cardiac safety in the research and development of new molecular agents begins with preclinical in-vitro models. A new model that is currently under evaluation is the human embryonic stem-cell derived cardiac myocytes (hESC-CM) (Peng, Lacerda, Kirsch, Brown, & Bruening-Wright, 2010). METHODS: hESC-CM were exposed in-vitro to 15 test compounds, and action potentials (AP) recorded with perforated patch-clamp technique to assess changes in AP duration (APD90) and upstroke velocity (Vmax). The test compounds included: 10 hERG channel, 4 Na⁺ channel, and 1 IKs channel inhibitors. For comparison purposes, the test compounds were evaluated in the isolated rabbit heart assay (IRH) to determine changes in conduction (QRS) and repolarization (QTc). Potency at hERG, NaV1.5 and IKs channel was also determined. RESULTS: For 7 of 10 hERG channel inhibitors, the potency values across the three functional assays were similar (≤5-fold). Three compounds (dofetilide, sertindole, and terfenadine) showed >10-fold discrepancy between hERG potency and inhibitory concentrations in the hESC-CM and IRH assays. Of the four Na⁺ channel inhibitors, only mexiletine exhibited similar potency values across the three assays (~3-fold); the others exhibited marked variation (>10-fold) in inhibitory potency. No effect on repolarization was observed in hESC-CM treated with a potent IKs blocker, but QTc prolongation was evident in the IRH. DISCUSSION: The functional data indicate that hESC-CM are sensitive for detecting repolarization delay induced by hERG channel blockade, and AP prolongation correlated with potency in the hERG channel and IRH assays. However, hESC-CM were less sensitive for detecting depolarizing delay by Na⁺ channel blockers, and unable to detect delayed repolarization caused by IKs blockade.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac safety is of paramount importance in contemporary drug development. Efficient and sensitive evaluation of cardiac safety in the research and development of new molecular agents begins with preclinical in-vitro models. A new model that is currently under evaluation is the human embryonic stem-cell derived cardiac myocytes (hESC-CM) (Peng, Lacerda, Kirsch, Brown, & Bruening-Wright, 2010). METHODS: hESC-CM were exposed in-vitro to 15 test compounds, and action potentials (AP) recorded with perforated patch-clamp technique to assess changes in AP duration (APD90) and upstroke velocity (Vmax). The test compounds included: 10 hERG channel, 4 Na⁺ channel, and 1 IKs channel inhibitors. For comparison purposes, the test compounds were evaluated in the isolated rabbit heart assay (IRH) to determine changes in conduction (QRS) and repolarization (QTc). Potency at hERG, NaV1.5 and IKs channel was also determined. RESULTS: For 7 of 10 hERG channel inhibitors, the potency values across the three functional assays were similar (≤5-fold). Three compounds (dofetilide, sertindole, and terfenadine) showed >10-fold discrepancy between hERG potency and inhibitory concentrations in the hESC-CM and IRH assays. Of the four Na⁺ channel inhibitors, only mexiletine exhibited similar potency values across the three assays (~3-fold); the others exhibited marked variation (>10-fold) in inhibitory potency. No effect on repolarization was observed in hESC-CM treated with a potent IKs blocker, but QTc prolongation was evident in the IRH. DISCUSSION: The functional data indicate that hESC-CM are sensitive for detecting repolarization delay induced by hERG channel blockade, and AP prolongation correlated with potency in the hERG channel and IRH assays. However, hESC-CM were less sensitive for detecting depolarizing delay by Na⁺ channel blockers, and unable to detect delayed repolarization caused by IKs blockade.
Authors: Guy Page; Phachareeya Ratchada; Yannick Miron; Guido Steiner; Andre Ghetti; Paul E Miller; Jack A Reynolds; Ken Wang; Andrea Greiter-Wilke; Liudmila Polonchuk; Martin Traebert; Gary A Gintant; Najah Abi-Gerges Journal: J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods Date: 2016-05-25 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: Yusheng Qu; Guy Page; Najah Abi-Gerges; Paul E Miller; Andre Ghetti; Hugo M Vargas Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Nathalie Nguyen; William Nguyen; Brynna Nguyenton; Phachareeya Ratchada; Guy Page; Paul E Miller; Andre Ghetti; Najah Abi-Gerges Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 4.566