A L Johnson1, J K Morrow, R W Sweeney. 1. Department of Clinical Studies - New Bolton Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA. amyjohn@vet.upenn.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent research suggests that serum : CSF titer ratios could provide the most accurate antemortem diagnosis of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM) caused by Sarcocystis neurona. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of two commercially available tests, the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and the surface antigen 2, 4/3 ELISA (SAG2, 4/3 ELISA), using archived paired serum and CSF samples. ANIMALS: Samples were obtained from 4 types of clinical patients. Confirmed positive cases (n = 9 horses; 11 sample sets) had neurologic deficits and postmortem lesions consistent with EPM. Confirmed negative cases (n = 28) had variable clinical signs and postmortem lesions consistent with another disease. Suspected positive cases (n = 6) had neurologic deficits consistent with EPM, marked improvement after treatment, and exclusion of other diseases. Suspected negative cases (n = 14) had variable signs with a strong presumptive diagnosis of another disease. METHODS: For each test, descriptive statistics were calculated using serum results alone, CSF results alone, and a serum : CSF titer ratio. RESULTS: Overall accuracy was highest for SAG2, 4/3 ELISA titer ratio at 0.97 (95% CI 0.88-0.99) with sensitivity = 0.88 (95% CI 0.66-0.97) and specificity = 1 (95% CI 0.92-1). IFAT CSF and titer ratio results also showed high accuracy at 0.88 (95% CI 0.77-0.94), but lower sensitivity = 0.65 (95% CI 0.41-0.83). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Using serum results alone was least accurate for both test types. The more accurate methods, such as the SAG2, 4/3 ELISA serum : CSF titer ratio, should be utilized.
BACKGROUND: Recent research suggests that serum : CSF titer ratios could provide the most accurate antemortem diagnosis of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM) caused by Sarcocystis neurona. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of two commercially available tests, the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and the surface antigen 2, 4/3 ELISA (SAG2, 4/3 ELISA), using archived paired serum and CSF samples. ANIMALS: Samples were obtained from 4 types of clinical patients. Confirmed positive cases (n = 9 horses; 11 sample sets) had neurologic deficits and postmortem lesions consistent with EPM. Confirmed negative cases (n = 28) had variable clinical signs and postmortem lesions consistent with another disease. Suspected positive cases (n = 6) had neurologic deficits consistent with EPM, marked improvement after treatment, and exclusion of other diseases. Suspected negative cases (n = 14) had variable signs with a strong presumptive diagnosis of another disease. METHODS: For each test, descriptive statistics were calculated using serum results alone, CSF results alone, and a serum : CSF titer ratio. RESULTS: Overall accuracy was highest for SAG2, 4/3 ELISA titer ratio at 0.97 (95% CI 0.88-0.99) with sensitivity = 0.88 (95% CI 0.66-0.97) and specificity = 1 (95% CI 0.92-1). IFAT CSF and titer ratio results also showed high accuracy at 0.88 (95% CI 0.77-0.94), but lower sensitivity = 0.65 (95% CI 0.41-0.83). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Using serum results alone was least accurate for both test types. The more accurate methods, such as the SAG2, 4/3 ELISA serum : CSF titer ratio, should be utilized.
Authors: K R Mullen; M C Furness; A L Johnson; T E Norman; K A Hart; A J Burton; R C Bicahlo; D M Ainsworth; M S Thompson; P V Scrivani Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: S M Reed; M Furr; D K Howe; A L Johnson; R J MacKay; J K Morrow; N Pusterla; S Witonsky Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Danielle Jaqueta Barberini; Monica Aleman; Fabio Aristizabal; Mathieu Spriet; Kaitlin C Clark; Naomi J Walker; Larry D Galuppo; Rogério Martins Amorim; Kevin D Woolard; Dori L Borjesson Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 6.832
Authors: Sarah Schale; Daniel Howe; Michelle Yeargan; Jennifer K Morrow; Amy Graves; Amy L Johnson Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 3.333