Literature DB >> 23517362

Clinical scoring and instrumental analysis to evaluate skin types.

D G Mercurio1, J H Segura, M B A Demets, P M B G Maia Campos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The biology of the skin is very complex, and there are a number of methods used to classify the different skin types. It is possible to measure or quantify the characteristics of the specific skin types, using a variety of techniques that can objectively evaluate the properties of the skin in a noninvasive manner. AIM: To clinically characterize different skin types by dermatological evaluation and biophysical and skin imaging techniques, and to evaluate the relationship between the different characteristics.
METHODS: The study recruited 26 volunteers. Clinical scoring was performed by a dermatologist who classified the volunteers' skin as normal or dry (group 1) and combination or oily (group 2). Objective measurements included skin microrelief, pH, oiliness, water content of the stratum corneum and transepidermal water loss (TEWL).
RESULTS: Positive correlations were found between the level of skin oiliness and skin texture obtained from both instrumental analysis and clinical scoring. The combination and oily skin types had higher clinical scores for shine intensity, oiliness and tendency to pigmentation, and also had higher objective scores for sebum secretion, TEWL and roughness.
CONCLUSIONS: Biophysical and skin imaging techniques are effective tools to help characterize skin type and assist in clinical dermatology. We found that different skin types had different characteristics related to skin microrelief, oiliness and TEWL, and therefore require specific dermatological treatments. © The Author(s) CED
© 2013 British Association of Dermatologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23517362     DOI: 10.1111/ced.12105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol        ISSN: 0307-6938            Impact factor:   3.470


  3 in total

1.  Objective and Patient-reported Assessments of Skin Grafts and Keystone Flaps-A Pilot Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Thomas D Dobbs; Thomas H Jovic; Zita M Jessop; Amanda Kyle; Hayley A Hutchings; Iain S Whitaker
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-11-16

2.  Adverse skin reactions among health care workers using face personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of six hospitals in Denmark.

Authors:  Jette G Skiveren; Malene F Ryborg; Britt Nilausen; Susan Bermark; Peter A Philipsen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.419

3.  Dynamic trends in skin barrier function from birth to age 6 months and infantile atopic dermatitis: A Chinese prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ying Ye; Piaoping Zhao; Limin Dou; Yi Zhang; Kaku Ken; Hongjian Gu; Yalan Dou; Wei Gao; Lingfeng He; Xiaotian Chen; Xiangyuan Huang; Lei Zhang; Yun Li; Liuhui Wang; Weili Yan
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 5.871

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.