Literature DB >> 23517004

Are environmental influences on physical activity distinct for urban, suburban, and rural schools? A multilevel study among secondary school students in Ontario, Canada.

Erin P Hobin1, Scott Leatherdale, Steve Manske, Joel A Dubin, Susan Elliott, Paul Veugelers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined differences in students' time spent in physical activity (PA) across secondary schools in rural, suburban, and urban environments and identified the environment-level factors associated with these between school differences in students' PA.
METHODS: Multilevel linear regression analyses were used to examine the environment- and student-level characteristics associated with time spent in PA among grades 9 to 12 students attending 76 secondary schools in Ontario, Canada, as part of the SHAPES-Ontario study. This approach was first conducted with the full data set testing for interactions between environment-level factors and school location. Then, school-location specific regression models were run separately.
RESULTS: Statistically significant between-school variation was identified among students attending urban (σ(2) μ0  = 8959.63 [372.46]), suburban (σ(2) μ0  = 8918.75 [186.20]), and rural (σ(2) μ0  = 9403.17 [203.69]) schools, where school-level differences accounted for 4.0%, 2.0%, and 2.1% of the variability in students' time spent in PA, respectively. Students attending an urban or suburban school that provided another room for PA or was located within close proximity to a shopping mall or fast food outlet spent more time in PA.
CONCLUSION: Students' time spent in PA varies by school location and some features of the school environment have a different impact on students' time spent in PA by school location. Developing a better understanding of the environment-level characteristics associated with students' time spent in PA by school location may help public health and planning experts to tailor school programs and policies to the needs of students in different locations.
© 2013, American School Health Association.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23517004     DOI: 10.1111/josh.12039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sch Health        ISSN: 0022-4391            Impact factor:   2.118


  10 in total

1.  Engaging Students in Physical Education: Key Challenges and Opportunities for Physical Educators in Urban Settings.

Authors:  Sarah Sliwa; Allison Nihiser; Sarah Lee; Nathan McCaughtry; Brian Culp; Shannon Michael
Journal:  J Phys Educ Recreat Dance       Date:  2017-02-26

2.  A quasi-experimental examination of how school-based physical activity changes impact secondary school student moderate- to vigorous- intensity physical activity over time in the COMPASS study.

Authors:  Stephen Hunter; Scott T Leatherdale; Kate Storey; Valerie Carson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 3.  The school environment and adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a mixed-studies systematic review.

Authors:  K L Morton; A J Atkin; K Corder; M Suhrcke; E M F van Sluijs
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 9.213

4.  A quasi-experimental examination of how changes in school-level intramurals are associated with physical activity among a sample of Canadian secondary school students from the COMPASS study.

Authors:  Kathleen E Burns; Ashok Chaurasia; Valerie Carson; Scott T Leatherdale
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-04-24

5.  Examining if changes in gender-specific and co-ed intramural programs affect youth physical activity over time: a natural experiment evaluation using school- and student-level data from the COMPASS study.

Authors:  Kathleen E Burns; Ashok Chaurasia; Valerie Carson; Scott T Leatherdale
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  An unsupervised machine learning approach to evaluate sports facilities condition in primary school.

Authors:  Jun Xia; Jihong Wang; Hua Chen; Jie Zhuang; Zhenbo Cao; Peijie Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  An evaluation of the 'bottom-up' implementation of the Active at school! programme in Quebec, Canada.

Authors:  Véronique Gosselin; Noémie Robitaille; Suzanne Laberge
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.734

8.  How Does the Campus Environment Influence Everyday Physical Activity? A Photovoice Study Among Students of Two German Universities.

Authors:  Julia von Sommoggy; Jana Rueter; Janina Curbach; Jessica Helten; Susanne Tittlbach; Julika Loss
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-10-05

9.  Fast-food restaurant, unhealthy eating, and childhood obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Jia; Miyang Luo; Yamei Li; Ju-Sheng Zheng; Qian Xiao; Jiayou Luo
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 9.213

10.  Examining If Changes in the Type of School-Based Intramural Programs Affect Youth Physical Activity over Time: A Natural Experiment Evaluation.

Authors:  Kathleen E Burns; Ashok Chaurasia; Valerie Carson; Scott T Leatherdale
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.