Literature DB >> 23517001

Barriers to providing the sexuality education that teachers believe students need.

Marla E Eisenberg1, Nikki Madsen, Jennifer A Oliphant, Renee E Sieving.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sexuality education teachers' perspectives are important to gain a full understanding of the issues surrounding teaching this subject. This study uses a statewide sample of public school teachers to examine what sexuality education content is taught, what barriers teachers face, and which barriers are associated with teaching specific topics.
METHODS: Participants included 368 middle and high school teachers with sexuality education assignments in Minnesota. Survey data included topics they teach, what they think they should teach, and barriers they face. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between barriers and teaching each of 9 sexual health topics, among those who believed the topic should be taught.
RESULTS: Almost two thirds of participants faced structural barriers; 45% were concerned about parent, student, or administrator response; and one quarter reported restrictive policies. Structural barriers were inversely associated with teaching about communication (OR = 0.20), teen parenting (OR = 0.34), and abortion (OR = 0.32); concerns about responses were associated only with teaching about sexual violence (OR = 0.42); and restrictive policies were inversely associated with teaching about abortion (OR = 0.23) and sexual orientation (OR = 0.47).
CONCLUSIONS: Addressing teachers' barriers requires a multipronged approach, including curriculum development and evaluation, training, and reframing the policy debate to support a wider range of sexuality education topics.
© 2013, American School Health Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23517001     DOI: 10.1111/josh.12036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sch Health        ISSN: 0022-4391            Impact factor:   2.118


  8 in total

1.  Discovering Sexual Health Conversations between Adolescents and Youth Development Professionals.

Authors:  Niodita Gupta; Aastha Chandak; Glen Gilson; Aja Kneip Pelster; Daniel J Schober; Richard Goldsworthy; Kathleen Baldwin; J Dennis Fortenberry; Christopher Fisher
Journal:  Am J Sex Educ       Date:  2015-03-20

2.  Chasing the rainbow: lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth and pride semiotics.

Authors:  Jennifer M Wolowic; Laura V Heston; Elizabeth M Saewyc; Carolyn Porta; Marla E Eisenberg
Journal:  Cult Health Sex       Date:  2016-11-10

3.  If We Build It, Will They Come? A Qualitative Study of Key Stakeholder Opinions on the Implementation of a Videogame Intervention for Risk Reduction in Adolescents.

Authors:  Tyra M Pendergrass; Kimberly Hieftje; Cindy A Crusto; Erika Montanaro; Lynn E Fiellin
Journal:  Games Health J       Date:  2016-06-23

4.  Promoting Sexual Health in High School: A Feasibility Study of A Web-based Media Literacy Education Program.

Authors:  Tracy Scull; Christina Malik; Abigail Morrison; Elyse Keefe
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2021-03-29

5.  Health care needs assessment among adolescents in correctional institutions in Zambia: an ethical analysis.

Authors:  Maureen Kumwenda; Selestine Nzala; Joseph M Zulu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Parents' and teachers' views on sexual health education and screening for sexually transmitted infections among in-school adolescent girls in Kenya: a qualitative study.

Authors:  George Wanje; Linnet Masese; Ethel Avuvika; Anisa Baghazal; Grace Omoni; R Scott McClelland
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Isolated Voices: Perspectives of Teachers, School Nurses, and Administrators Regarding Implementation of Sexual Health Education Policy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dickson; Mark Parshall; Claire D Brindis
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2019-12-08       Impact factor: 2.118

8.  Key informant perspectives on sexual health services for travelling young adults: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Gareau; Karen P Phillips
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.