| Literature DB >> 23516578 |
Alberto Crespo Guardo1, Carmen Alvarez-Fernández, Hodei Arberas, Javier García-Pérez, Felipe García, Manuel Enric Bargalló, María José Maleno, José María Gatell, Beatriz Mothe, José Alcami, Sonsoles Sánchez-Palomino, Montserrat Plana.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Generation of new reagents that can be used to screen or monitor HIV-1-specific responses constituted an interesting field in the development of HIV vaccines to improve their efficacy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23516578 PMCID: PMC3597525 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058927
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Comparison of frequencies and magnitudes of responses against the different viral particles and peptides pools tested.
(A) Bars show the percentage of individuals with positive response to the different constructs (Black bars) and the gag p24, p17 and small proteins (sp) and nef peptide pools (White bars) among the samples of HIV+ individuals tested. (B) Each symbol represents the mean of SFC (spot forming cells/106 cells) ± SEM counted per condition after background subtraction. P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Ranks test for continuous variables and χ2-test for categorical variables. The magnitude of response was significantly different among indicated stimuli (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001).
Figure 2Example of IFN-γ response in CD4 and CD8 T cell subsets from different individuals: full responder (FR) vs non-responder (NR).
(A) Representative dot plots of gating strategy used and cytokine responses detected using different stimuli. Box indicated the percentage of IFN-γ+ T cells. PMA-Ionophore was used as a positive control. (B) Evaluation of cytokine production in both subsets (CD4 and CD8). Percentage of T cells producing IFN-γ, TNF-α or IL-2 in response to virions (ΔRT or WT+AT2) or to a pool of peptides encompassing p24 is depicted.
Figure 3Frequency of IFN-γ-ELISPOT positive responses against different pools of peptides.
(A) Population analyzed has been divided attending to their positive response against WT+AT2 and/or ΔRT immunogens into three different groups (FR: full-responders; PR: partial-responders and NR: non-responders). The response obtained against overlapping pools of peptides from Gag and Nef showed a different pattern between established groups. Gag response was predominant in responder individuals (see results). CEF peptide pool was used as an HIV-independent peptide stimulus. (B) Magnitude (SFC/106 PBMC) of HIV-1-specific T-cell responses against Gag (p24, p17 and p6-p7) protein was not affected among groups whereas Nef present a significant reduction in non-responder individuals. Epitopes from human cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus and influenza virus (CEF peptide pool) showed a higher magnitude in responder individuals. Statistically significant differences are shown (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001).
Figure 4Percentage of expression of activation markers (CD38 and CD69) in CD4 and CD8 T cell subsets.
Extracellular staining revealed that baseline activation levels varied significantly between full-responders and non-responders HIV-infected individuals in CD4+CD38+ and CD4+CD69+ subsets. Mann–Whitney P value is shown.
Demographic characteristics of the studied groups.
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
| Male |
|
|
|
| Female |
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Median |
|
|
|
| Range |
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Homosexual |
|
|
|
| Drug users |
|
|
|
| Heterosexual |
|
|
|
| Hemophilia |
|
|
|
Clinical parameters of the studied groups.
|
|
|
| ||
| Plasma HIV RNA, median (IQR), copies/ml | ||||
|
|
|
| ||
| CD4+ T-cell count, mean (95% CI), cells/mm3 | ||||
|
|
|
| ||
| NADIR CD4+, mean (95% CI), cells/mm3 | ||||
|
|
|
| ||
| CD8+ T-cell count, mean (95% CI), cells/mm3 | ||||
|
|
|
| ||
| Duration of HAART treatment prior to PBMC sample*, median (IQR), months | ||||
|
|
|
| ||
| Prevalence of infection by VHC (%) | ||||
|
|
|
| ||
HLA-B subtypes carrier and allele frequencies in the asymptomatic population analyzed.
| Responder population (n = 17) | Non-responder population (n = 21) | ||||||
| n | Carrier frequency | Allele frequency | n | Carrier frequency | Allele frequency | ||
|
| 4 | 23% | 11% | 2 | 9% | 4.5% | |
|
| 3 | 17% | 8.5% | 3 | 14% | 7% | |
|
| 2 | 12% | 6% | 4 | 18% | 9% | |
|
| 1 | 6% | 3% | 1 | 5% | 2.5% | |
|
| 1 | 6% | 3% | 1 | 5% | 2.5% | |